FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA

U.S./World

Utah to appeal gay marriage ruling to high court

By From page A10 | July 10, 2014

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah is going directly to the nation’s highest court to challenge a federal appeals court ruling that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry, the state attorney general’s office announced Wednesday.

The state opted to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court rather than request a review from the entire 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver. That option is now off the table, no matter what the high court decides.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes’ office said in a statement the appeal will be filed in the coming weeks, to get “clarity and resolution” from the highest court. “Attorney General Reyes has a sworn duty to defend the laws of our state,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court is under no obligation to hear the appeal of the June 25 ruling by a three-judge 10th Circuit panel, said William Eskridge, a Yale University law professor. There also is no deadline to make a decision, he said.

The panel’s June 25 ruling found states cannot deprive people of the fundamental right to marry simply because they choose partners of the same sex.

The 2-1 decision marked the first time a federal appeals court weighed in on the matter. It became law in the six states covered by the 10th Circuit: Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming.

However, the panel immediately put the ruling on hold pending an appeal.

The Utah case is certain to pique the Supreme Court’s interest, but the justices usually look for cases that involve split rulings from federal appeals courts, said Douglas NeJaime, a University of California-Irvine law professor. The court may wait and take up the matter after one or more of the five other appeals courts with pending gay marriage cases has ruled.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments about Virginia’s ban in early May, and a ruling is expected soon. Arguments are scheduled for August and September in two different courts for cases out of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Nevada and Idaho.

Eskridge doesn’t expect a quick decision from the high court.

“Why make a decision on the Utah case until they see what the other circuits are going to do?” Eskridge said.

The ruling by the 10th Circuit panel upheld a lower court’s decision that overturned Utah’s gay marriage ban, which voters approved in 2004. More than 1,000 same-sex couples in Utah wed after the ban was struck down and before the Supreme Court issued a stay.

The panel considered a similar challenge to Oklahoma’s gay marriage ban, but it has not ruled in that case.

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert hoped the state would appeal to the Supreme Court, his office said recently. The governor said the state already anticipated and budgeted for a need to defend the law before the highest court.

Utah has spent about $300,000 paying three outside attorneys to defend its same-sex marriage ban. It would cost another $300,000 to have the trio defend the case at the Supreme Court, the state estimates.

Plaintiff Moudi Sbeity called the decision to take the case to the high court “wonderful news.” He and his partner, Derek Kitchen, are one of three gay and lesbian couples who sued Utah over its gay marriage ban.

“We are one step closer toward having our families recognized in our home state,” Sbeity said. “It’s definitely a case our Supreme Court needs to hear. The faster we can move on this, the better for all of us.”

 

The Associated Press

The Associated Press

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 9 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • 2realJuly 10, 2014 - 6:04 am

    Smart people in utah. Keep up the good work

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JimboJuly 10, 2014 - 3:18 pm

    Soon nationwide gay people will be treated as equals regarding marriage rights. Thanks Utah for showing you have no credible argument for your position in court just like the rest.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JagJuly 10, 2014 - 9:05 pm

    Remember the California voters rejected the law to and the only reason why California lost is because the attorney general and governor refused to fight it so the group that filed the law suit did not have standing, I am not saying Utah is going to win but they do have standing so the case will be heard, If they win I bet the next thing will be a suit filed in California against the attorney general and governor for not following the duties of their office, I am sure you know the old saying, keep throwing mud up against the wall and something will stick, It is just a matter of time before one of these states are going to stop it, weather I am for or against gay mirage makes no difference but I do think the country should have one law on this issue because people move state to state.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JimboJuly 10, 2014 - 9:29 pm

    And that pesky constitution thingie all the courts keep bringing up and you conveniently left out. Meanwhile in reality Indiana and Kentucky both had their bans on equal marriage tossed out as well. What is sad and so obvious about the crowd still against equality is that they are just openly trying in vain to make the world see them as they see themselves. And they see themselves believing their 'god' thinks they are better than everyone else.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JagJuly 10, 2014 - 10:00 pm

    I was not aware of those rulings but with some quick reading I see you are correct so lets get one law and move on, the constitution has got to come first

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksJuly 10, 2014 - 4:14 pm

    This is what happens when religion fails to yield to the law. Fight on when you know absolutely you will lose. Dumb.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895July 10, 2014 - 7:38 pm

    It's a political necessity for Utah to appeal, that's all.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MEJuly 11, 2014 - 12:11 am

    Equality for all! Does this mean that i can marry my sister? Equal rights.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895July 11, 2014 - 12:48 am

    No.

    Reply | Report abusive comment

Special Publications »

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.