
In this Monday, Dec. 31, 2012 photo, Oakland Chief of Police Howard Jordan, center, carries in a cross bearing the name of one of the city's homicide victims at the annual Cross Ceremony to remember the people who were killed during the preceding year, at St. Columba Catholic Church in Oakland, Calif. Battered by a rising homicide rate and tens of millions of dollars in legal settlements, the Oakland Police Department is embarking on the most drastic leadership change in its history. In December, city officials and two civil rights lawyers agreed to allow a court-appointed director to oversee policing here as part the reforms mandated by a decade-old brutality lawsuit settlement. The unprecedented oversight comes as police officials and a mayor who survived two recall campaigns are working to rebuild public trust in this rugged port city known as one of the most violent in America. (AP Photo/Oakland Tribune, Bay Area News Group, D. Ross Cameron)
OAKLAND — Sadness and frustration washed over many who stood before 131 white wooden crosses planted outside a church in memory of the city’s homicide victims last year.
When the name of each was called, a cross was pulled up and passed to a relative, friend or onlooker.
Clutching two crosses, community activist Todd Walker hugged Oakland Mayor Jean Quan and Police Chief Howard Jordan, then shook his head in disbelief.
“This is much worse than last year,” Walker said angrily. “Somebody’s not doing their job. Whatever this city has planned has got to be better than this. It has to be!”
Battered by the highest murder rate in six years and persistent upheaval, this rugged port city’s police department is embarking on the most drastic leadership change in its history. A court-appointed director will oversee the department as it tries to complete reforms stemming from a costly decade-old brutality lawsuit.
Reporting to a federal judge, the director will have the power to overrule major department decisions as well as seek the dismissal of the police chief and his command staff.
The unprecedented oversight comes as Jordan –the department’s third chief in four years– and Quan –who survived two recall campaigns – are working to reduce crime and rebuild public trust in one of the most dangerous cities in America.
“Those are two very difficult tasks, but they aren’t conflicting priorities,” said Frank Zimring, a University of California, Berkeley law professor. “Good police management can pursue both objectives simultaneously.”
Last year, Oakland saw a 23 percent increase in violent crime from 2011. Among the homicides in 2012 were seven at tiny Oikos University, where police say a disgruntled former nursing student opened fire on students and staff. It was the deadliest school shooting of the year until the massacre last month in Newtown, Conn., that killed 28.
Recently, an Oakland grandmother was hit by crossfire as she walked from a corner store, and a young father was shot while pushing his toddler son in a stroller. A dozen children were slain 2012, including a 15-year-old girl gunned down last weekend.
The spike in homicides, much of it gang-related, is 21 more than the 110 recorded in 2011 – the year the city became the national epicenter for the Occupy movement. Police came under fire for their response to sometimes-violent protests, and now dozens of officers face potential discipline for misconduct.
“It’s no secret that Oakland’s had a tough year in crime. It’s been faced with many challenges from Occupy (Oakland), to Oikos, to street level crime,” Quan said recently. “The crime in this city is too high. And it affects everyone.”
Quan’s has been widely criticized for downplaying Oakland’s escalating violence, especially for touting the city’s arts and nightlife during her State of the City address.
“She was trying to change that consistently negative perception that Oakland has in the United States,” said Councilwoman Pat Kernighan, the public safety committee chairwoman. “City leaders do not have their heads in the sand.
“Bringing violence down is our number one issue,” she added. “It is the elephant in the room.”
Oakland wasn’t the only Bay Area city where homicides spiked last year. Neighboring San Francisco had 68 murders, up from 50 in 2011. San Jose, the area’s most populous city, had 46 homicides last year, a 20-year high. But those cities have much bigger populations than Oakland’s roughly 400,000.
To help combat the bloodshed here, city officials announced late last month that former New York City police commissioner and Los Angeles police chief Bill Bratton was hired as a consultant. Bratton is widely credited with cutting crime in both cities by double-digit percentages.
In helping Oakland reduce violence, officials say Bratton will strengthen the police department’s use of CompStat, the computerized crime-mapping system he co-created in the 1990s to direct police resources to high-crime areas.
“I’m not coming in with any fantasies,” Bratton recently told KNTV-TV. “You have a critical situation in that city.”
Bratton was hired after a federal judge stopped short of taking over the department over the city’s failure to comply with court-mandated reforms stemming from a brutality scandal.
A 2003 lawsuit alleging several rogue officers beat or framed drug suspects in 2000 resulted in nearly $11 million in payments to 119 plaintiffs.
The settlement initially called for the reforms to be completed within five years. But plaintiffs’ attorneys John Burris and Jim Chanin repeatedly said that high-ranking city officials thwarted those efforts, and the lawyers asked the judge in October to place the department under federal control.
Instead, U.S. District Court Judge Thelton Henderson signed off in December on an agreement reached between city officials and civil rights attorneys that provides for a court-appointed compliance director with sweeping powers over the department.
The judge warned that more delays in completing reforms could result in “monetary sanctions, expansion of the compliance director’s powers or a full (federal) receivership.”
Jordan is optimistic for a better year.
“I feel very responsible for some of the things that are happening,” he told reporters recently. “I take ownership as the chief of police that this stuff is happening on my watch. We are taking a very aggressive approach toward the beginning of (2013) because we feel our efforts have to be counted on now, instead of later.”
The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
S KJanuary 06, 2013 - 9:05 am
Jordan says that," HE FEELS RESPONSIBLE." (???!!!) Hey it is not your fault that Oakland has so many scumbags, mostly gang member slugs and so many drug problems. It is so unfortunate that so many innocents like a Grandmother crossing the street or a 15 yr. old girl has to die. Round up all the gang members into buses and trains and take them out to the Mojave Desert, in, "Hunger Games, " fashion, and let them fight it out, till the last one drops. Short of that my answer, if I were King or Governor, would be to order the National Guard onto the streets of Oakland, and initiating Marshall Law and a 10PM curfew for EVERYONE, except for those with permission or a genuine reason to be out, on transit (I.E: Like to and from WORK). Otherwise, no reason, no excuse, minimum 30 days in lock up. That might help to fend off the problem.
Reply |Rich GiddensJanuary 06, 2013 - 8:57 pm
With apologizes to the good citizens of the United States! All of this horrible tragedy is by design---nefarious design. It goes back to 1965 with the creation of the welfare and entitlement society. The government created incentives for people to have kids out of wedlock and then go to the government for assistance--welfare, housing and food stamps. This in turn destroyed the critical family structure of 2 parents providing, nuturing, mentoring and most importantly, controlling their kids. With the demon seed of social destruction sown, a new governmental entity had to grow to counteract and balance it---the police state! It too had to be fed and grown to become the monster that it along with the welfare state have become---each cancelling the other out. All of it needs to be limited, capped and dismantled. The rule of law, society, the economy, our security and the US Constitution have been destroyed in the process. I know what both sides of this rotten equation are saying--- "my unearned entitlements are a right!" and "If I lose my police job my family will be on welfare!". We can rebuild our nation. It doesn't have to be this way. America doesn't have to be destroyed. There can be a future for our precious children.
Reply |