House chairman: $3.7B border request ‘too much’

By From page A10 | July 12, 2014

WASHINGTON — A key Republican said Friday that President Barack Obama’s multibillion-dollar emergency request for the border is too big to get through the House, as a growing number of Democrats rejected policy changes Republicans are demanding as their price for approving any money.

The developments indicated that Obama faces an uphill climb as he pushes Congress to approve $3.7 billion to deal with tens of thousands of unaccompanied kids who’ve been arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border from poor and gang-ridden Central American nations. And they suggested that even as the children keep coming, any final resolution is likely weeks away on Capitol Hill.

As House members gathered Friday morning to finish up legislative business for the week, Rep. Hal Rogers of Kentucky, chairman of the Appropriations Committee that controls spending, told reporters: “It’s too much money. We don’t need it.”

Rogers, who’d previously sounded open to the spending request for more immigration judges, State Department programs and other items, said that Obama’s request includes some spending to meet immediate needs, and his committee is working to sort that out.

But he said other aspects can be handled through Congress’ regular spending bills, though no final action is likely on those until after the November midterm elections. And asked whether the House would approve the spending package as-is, he said “no.”

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest responded by saying that “we’re open to working with Democrats and Republicans in Congress to get this done.”

“The thing that I would point out, though, is that the president has moved quickly to be very clear about what specifically needs to be funded,” Earnest said. “And we would like to see Republicans back up their rhetoric with the kind of urgent action that this situation merits.”

Rogers spoke shortly after the Congressional Hispanic Caucus convened a press conference to denounce efforts to attach legal changes to the spending measure that would result in returning the children home more quickly to El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. Those countries account for the bulk of the more than 57,000 kids who’ve arrived since October.

Republicans are demanding such changes, and White House officials also have indicated support, while House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid left the door open to them this week.

But key Senate Democrats are opposed, and members of the all-Democratic Hispanic Caucus added their strong objections Friday that sending the kids home quickly without immigration hearings could put them at risk.

“I don’t know of a man or a woman in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus who is going to vote to undermine the rights of these children,” said Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill. “It would be unconscionable for us to do that.”

Gutierrez said the lawmakers would make that same case directly to Obama in a meeting next week. And he pleaded for Democrats to stand firm.

“I’m tired of every time the Republicans raise their voices against the immigrants that somehow we ameliorate, we change our position and weaken our stance,” Gutierrez said. “Our stance should be clear — we’re for the immigrants.”

The policy changes in question concern a 2008 law aimed at helping victims of human trafficking that appears to be contributing to the current crisis by ensuring court hearings for the children now arriving from Central America. In practice, that often allows them to stay in this country for years as their cases wend their way through the badly backlogged immigration court system, and oftentimes they never show up for their court dates.

Obama administration officials along with Republican lawmakers want to change the law so that Central American kids can be treated the same way as Mexican kids, who can be turned around quickly by Border Patrol agents.

“If you want to stop the problem, treat the children humanely and send them back. I guarantee you it will work,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Friday in a speech in Louisville.

Democrats and advocacy groups say such a change would put the kids in jeopardy.

“We will oppose this link even if it means the funding bill goes down,” said Kevin Appleby, director of migration and refugee policy for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. If the changes go through, “They’ll be sent back to their persecutors with no help whatsoever, and possibly to their deaths.”

The border controversy spilled over to a gathering of the National Governors Association in Nashville, Tenn., where governors of both parties blamed a gridlocked Congress.

“Congress needs to act,” declared Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin, the group’s Republican chairman. “They are children, so we want to treat them very humanely, but we also have a lot of concerns for the health and wellness of our citizens in our state.”


The Associated Press

The Associated Press


Discussion | 3 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • CD BrooksJuly 12, 2014 - 10:13 am

    Okay enough of this, STOP blaming everybody else it is time to get to the cold hard truth and move forward. Think about your maid, your gardener perhaps the spot where you buy fresh produce. They said “oh hey, these folks do the jobs you don’t want to.” We bought into it and looked the other way. Fast forward twenty years and look at us. Laws and regulations that protect us also protect criminals and illegal visitors. If you want to send a message cut off all goods and services to every non-citizen. ALL goods and services. Post notice on billboards and in newspapers across the country in several languages. "If you are here illegally, take your family and leave. You are no longer welcome in America you will no longer receive jobs, pay, services or benefits here." Give those folks 30 days to comply then start mass deportations. If you hired illegal workers, fire them. If you know of undocumented people, rat them out. Take away their opportunity to make money and don’t allow them to spend their money here. You want jobs? This will open millions of them. Stop the stupid process of processing and load busses and airplanes whatever, haul those kids away. Let their country take care of them and don’t give anybody more money. Okay bummer, some of them aren’t going to make it. Sorry their decision not ours. This is cruel and unusual, so is their draining of our resources. So is their coming here and forcing their culture on us and being allowed to do so! NO! This is NOT your country! We don’t want to do this but we don’t want them continuing to drain our resources either. Do we?! Turn off the faucet, bring the military home and let them guard the borders. Make the US an enemy to invading freeloaders. We created the problem, we’re all complicit. Now we have to get mean. Say bye-bye nice knowing you… and live with it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • KenRJuly 12, 2014 - 12:36 pm

    CD Forcing their culture on us and being allowed to so? Their culture was here before CA became a state. It was part of Mexico. I am of the opinion that our economy needs all these consumers.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksJuly 12, 2014 - 3:34 pm

    KenR, I won't argue their financial value. What I was referring to was their in-our-face celebrations and demands to extract more from us. They deserve nothing and that is what they should get.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.