Bill would add ‘parent’ box to birth certificates

By From page A5 | August 15, 2014

SACRAMENTO — The state Senate approved legislation Thursday that would make California the latest state to modify birth certificates to accommodate same-sex couples who become parents, but not before generating criticism from a Republican lawmaker.

Under the bill, birth certificates in California will have three check boxes for parents starting in January 2016: mother, father and parent. Republican Sen. Jim Nielsen voted against it, saying the change diminishes the traditional definition of parents.

“It removes the dignity of the term husband and wife, mother and father,” said Nielsen, who represents a largely agricultural region in Northern California. “No one can argue this bill does not diminish the significance of those terms in American society. I urge a ‘no’ vote. Stand up for ‘mother;’ stand up for ‘father.’”

In response, Democratic Sen. Mark Leno of San Francisco said there is nothing offensive in the legislation and that it seeks to treat all couples equally by including all three terms as check-off boxes.

“There is no disrespect in using gender-neutral terms . . . so everyone feels included,” he said. “I support mothers and fathers; we can do both.”

AB1951 by state Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez, D-Los Angeles, passed on a 26-4 vote. It will return to the Assembly for a final vote on technical amendments before going to the governor.

If the bill is eventually signed into law, California would become the first state to make such an update to birth certificates legislatively. Several states have already done so through administrative action, said Josh Steichmann, a spokesman for Equality California, which sponsored the legislation.

Some California counties already use check-off boxes on birth certificates with the terms mother/parent or father/parent, but some continue to use just mother and father. The bill would ensure that the forms are standardized statewide, Steichmann said.

The old forms would have to be discarded, according to the bill.


The Associated Press

The Associated Press


Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Shanna WieserAugust 14, 2014 - 5:48 pm

    Just so our politicians would appear to know what they are voting on why would one "throw out old forms" when they are printed up on the printed as they are ordered and paid for. So the illusion of waste is just that an illusion. Changes to program might cost something. Just saying reporter.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.