State, national columnists

What if there’s no such thing as post-racial?

By May 06, 2014

It usually makes me uncomfortable when people suffer bad consequences for actions or statements, no matter how repugnant, that they have every right to assume are private.

So perhaps you share a few qualms with me over the fate of Donald Sterling, the owner of the L.A. Clippers, who recently was banned for life from the NBA for making racist remarks during a phone conversation with his girlfriend.

But if we have any qualms, let’s get over them, and quickly. Free speech is a justly esteemed hallmark of what it means to be an American. But the Constitution doesn’t guarantee any of us the right to own a basketball team.

Commentators have thoroughly rebuked Sterling. And the same for Cliven Bundy, the renegade rancher who was, briefly, a right-wing, anti-government hero until his clueless racism expressed itself in suggestions that maybe, after all, blacks were better off as slaves.

In their ignorance and backwardness, old-timers like Sterling and Bundy deserve whatever condemnation we bother to heap on them, but in some respects their remarks represent racism’s lowest-hanging fruit.

Columnists with the credentials to know what they’re talking about – Eugene Robinson, Leonard Pitts, Colbert King, among others – have noted that racism’s real power doesn’t express itself in the mutterings of old men.

No, these writers are more concerned about racism’s less blatant manifestations, like racial profiling and the disproportionate incarceration of blacks for crimes that blacks commit no more often than whites. For example, Robinson reports that blacks are four times more likely to be arrested for illegal drug use, a crime that blacks commit at about the same rate as whites.

Further, Robinson refers to a report from the Institute on Assets and Social Policy, which documents a tripling of the “wealth gap” between African-American and white families between 1984 and 2009.

In our culture, distinctions that have a racial component are many, from home ownership to health to educational outcomes to executions to levels of representation in the offices of real power and influence. Some of the discrimination is intentional, some subconscious. In fact, more than one study has demonstrated that identical applications for employment and other benefits are regularly rejected or accepted based solely on the presumed race of the applicant.

Some of this is the legacy of slavery. Some of it comes from a post-slavery century of Jim Crow, during which blacks were systematically – and often legally – excluded from full participation in mainstream American life.

But my concern is that, despite our best aspirations, there’s no such thing as a truly post-racial world. Our sense of “the other” is primal or tribal. Our instincts urge us to defend and promote people that resemble us. And the human inclination to discriminate and reject people that are different is evident in our history and throughout the current world.

From Donald Sterling to voter I.D. laws intended to disenfranchise minorities to the vilest expressions of racial hatred that result from the shallowest trolling of the Internet, differentiation by race is still a powerful force in our country.

Except when we pretend that it isn’t. The Supreme Court’s recent decision that permits Michigan to outlaw college admissions based on the consideration of race undercuts affirmative action, our country’s conscious effort to compensate for our failure to eliminate racial discrimination. Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, the court depends on the unproven notion that our culture has gotten beyond racism and reached the happy land of universal tolerance and goodwill.

The remarkable distance our country has come since the mid-’60s is worth celebrating. But the blithe assumption that racism is dead because we have a black president harbors an inherent contradiction and paradox. We protest too much. Racism won’t really be dead until we get past noticing and pointing out the fact that the president, or anyone else, is any particular color, at all. We’re not there yet.

John M. Crisp, an op-ed columnist for McClatchy-Tribune, teaches in the English Department at Del Mar College in Corpus Christi, Texas. Readers may send him email at [email protected]

John M. Crisp


Discussion | 6 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Rick WoodMay 06, 2014 - 2:03 am

    One of our biggest problems, which Crisp hints at, is we don't have different words for the different manifestations or types of racism. So we have to find the right adjectives. For my own thinking, I've come up with "rational racism," "ignorant racism," and "virulent racism." We should all accept that racism is normal, maybe even healthy, and we should stop taking offense at merely being labeled racist unless we know what type is meant. We often assume when someone says "racist" he means either virulent or at least ignorant racist, but let's give each other the benefit of the doubt and try to find out before we react. Profiling is usually based on rational racism, but it switches over to something else if it persists in light of more data about the person being profiled. Both the profiled and the profiler should cut each other some slack until they learn about each other a bit more than what is evident from an initial encounter. Trayvon Martin would be alive today in all likelihood if he had learned that lesson before that fateful night George Zimmerman shot him.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • PornacMay 06, 2014 - 6:53 am

    What racism? I just don't like Obama cause he's black.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • S KMay 06, 2014 - 7:28 am

    Back in College (Laney College in Oakland, back in 1971), during an English class discussion, I said that all this stuff would end once the races have been totally all mixed up together and that the only race will be one big mixed race. That must have impressed this very gorgeous looking black chick, with her then stylish afro, who after class asked me if I would like to go for coffee. I was so flabbergasted and taken by surprise, cause she was so BEAUTIFUL and I was just, Well>>>>ME. Plus I was at that time already going with my now Wife (42 yrs. in June :-) )). Anyway, I still feel bad about about that, turning her down. She may have thought that I was a hypocrite, even though I had brought my then girlfriend, now Wife, to class on occasion. But oh thinking back, me and that beautiful woman could have begun the NEW RACE>>LOL LOL :-)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • The MisterMay 06, 2014 - 7:28 am

    Of course there will never be such a thing as "post-racial"... not as long as those in control can create conflict and crisis to further their goal of more power and control. Examples are the government who pits racial groups against one another with quotas and preferences; Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson who blackmail vulnerable corporations with the threat of a negative media campaign; and any number of politicians who undermine assimilation in favor of Balkanization (you know, like "press 2 for English" and "amnesty"). Of course their schemes, and thus their power, only survives because we, the people, allow it. Thus, it's your fault for doing nothing. "All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing." (Attributed to Edmund Burke)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895May 06, 2014 - 8:12 am

    "But my concern is that, despite our best aspirations, there’s no such thing as a truly post-racial world" is an interesting statement. Maybe a "truly post-racial world" isn't something we should aspire to, especial if you agree that tribalism, or racism, is natural. Our focus should be on understanding and acceptance rather than to re-engineer the human genome--use the brains God gave us; don't try to stamp out human nature in a way that can only lead to frustration and conflict.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • StaceyMay 06, 2014 - 2:36 pm

    Gosh, I love every person. And that's how I choose to be. I just wish more people would too

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.