crisp column sig

State, national columnists

Preparing for the psychology of open carry

By From page A8 | February 26, 2014

One wonders if, in retrospect, Curtis Reeves and Michael Dunn wish that they had left their guns at home when they went out on Jan. 13, 2014, and Nov. 23, 2012, respectively.

Reeves, 71, took his wife to the movies at a theater near Tampa, Fla.  During the previews, he confronted Chad Oulson, a 43-year-old sitting in front of him, for using his cell phone.  The details are in dispute, but Oulson appears to have thrown popcorn at Reeves, who pulled a .380 semiautomatic pistol from his pocket and fatally shot Oulson in the chest.

Reeves is in jail, without bail, awaiting trial for second-degree murder.

Michael Dunn stopped at a convenience store in Jacksonville, Fla.  While his girlfriend went inside, Dunn asked an SUV full of young guys parked next to him to turn their music down.  Again, the details are in dispute, but heated words were exchanged.

Dunn says that he thought he saw the barrel of a shotgun, so he pulled a pistol from his glove compartment and fired 10 shots into the fleeing SUV.  Three of the bullets hit Jordan Davis, 17, killing him.

Last week Dunn was found guilty of attempted murder, and he may be retried on the murder charge.  Dunn, 47, faces 60 years in prison.

First, the obvious: neither of these events would have occurred if Reeves and Dunn hadn’t had deadly weapons readily available.  Someone might have gotten a black eye or busted lip, but probably no one would have been killed or still be in jail.

But both Reeves and Dunn had a legal right to carry their weapons, and screenings and background checks are unlikely to have discovered personality traits or behaviors that might have prevented them from doing so.

In fact, they seem like more or less ordinary people.  Dunn was a computer programmer and software developer who had just left a wedding reception for his son.  Reeves retired as a captain in the Tampa Police Department in 1993.

Loud music is obnoxious and texting in movie theaters is annoying.  But in a culture that equates noise with quality and that increasingly considers the right to text in all situations as near-constitutional, many of us have developed resistance to the impulse to call out irresponsible fellow citizens, especially when an opportunity to defuse the situation – moving to a different parking space or theater seat – is available.

But despite the powerful gun lobby’s emphasis on gun ownership for personal protection, Reeves’ and Dunn’s actions raise a question: Did easy access to a gun have the ironic effect of inspiring more aggression and less willingness to back off than were prudent?

The question is increasingly poignant as more citizens are encouraged to carry concealed weapons because they believe that others are carrying them, and as states make laws that permit and promote concealed carry and, increasingly, open carry.

National Rifle Association-types imagine that open carry will usher in the Peaceable Kingdom, where the lion and the lamb lie down together calmly because the lamb is patently well armed.

But once citizens begin publicly displaying in holsters their fears, insecurities, paranoia, aggression and inclinations to intimidate, I suspect we’ll see more confrontations like Reeves’ and Dunn’s, quarrels that should evaporate in retreat, harsh words, or fistfights but, instead, turn into gunplay.

In fact, before we turn our country into the Old West, let’s note that the central, indispensable icon of all Western movies is the gunfight.  We should probably be prepared for more of them.

John M. Crisp, an op-ed columnist for McClatchy-Tribune, teaches in the English Department at Del Mar College in Corpus Christi, Texas. Readers may send him email at [email protected].

John M. Crisp


Discussion | 3 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • The MisterFebruary 25, 2014 - 6:46 am

    Blah, blah, blah. The crazies and the crooks don't give a toss about gun laws and will use a gun on you at the drop of a hat. It's the responsible people who want to defend themselves and their family when one of these crazies or crooks goes off in front of them. And it is these responsible people the politicians are doing everything they can to deny them the right to that self-defense. Gun laws only apply to the law-abiding! Gun laws, as has been shown, do nothing to stop a shooting. It only adds extra charges the prosecution can use to send the thug or the nut away for a couple of years... while your dead family member is still dead! When seconds count, cops are only minutes away.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • vallejoanFebruary 25, 2014 - 6:47 am

    "because they believe that others are carrying them" Well, in Vallejo, they are. If you look at arrests made here, charges of carrying without a permit (often accompanied by charges of possession an unregistered handgun and being a felon in possession of a firearm) happen all the time. Not only where violence or other crime is involved, but during routine traffic stops. Whether more people carrying legally, whether concealed or open, will help or harm, I can't say. I can only say, look at studies and statistics instead of isolated incidents.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksFebruary 25, 2014 - 8:21 am

    I always say that road rage is my biggest concern with right to carry. The carnage out there might be overwhelming. Imagine the innocent victims because of st*pidity and piss-poor shooting skills. Right to carry or not, we have a nation-wide epidemic with lack of enforcement. Without that, your right of freedom trumps my right to safety and that is unacceptable

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.