navarrette column sig

State, national columnists

Cold and calculating on immigration

By From page A11 | July 03, 2014

Whenever President Obama acts unilaterally on immigration reform – and it’s not often enough – the reactions on both the right and the left are so predictable.

Conservatives will holler that the sky is falling and charge that Obama is acting like a king rather than a president. They’ll insist that, by failing to consult with Congress, he’s trampling on the separation of powers, and that he seeks to impose by fiat a makeshift version of amnesty.

Liberals will take a crumb and declare it a steak. Three reasons: They’re desperate. They want to pretend that they moved the president to act. And they want to think they didn’t misjudge Obama from the beginning, mistaking for a reformer someone who turned out to be one of the biggest immigration restrictionists to occupy the White House.

You’ll hear both perspectives over the next few weeks now that Obama has said he is finally prepared to use his executive authority to curtail deportations of illegal immigrants. This would be the same executive authority that Obama and many of his surrogates have spent the last few years insisting that he didn’t have. They were afraid of the political pushback. Now Obama claims that he is ordering his advisers to develop a list of executive actions he could take to ease off the deportations of those illegal immigrants who do not pose a threat to public safety, and that he intends to take some sort of action by the end of the summer.

Immigrant advocates – including the “dreamers,” those undocumented young people who have shaken up the immigration debate by holding both parties accountable – are giddy at the prospect that they might have finally gotten through and convinced Obama about the need to lessen his deportation juggernaut. They hope that the president will extend the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which Obama unveiled in June 2012 in an attempt to win over Latino voters for his re-election. DACA allows young undocumented immigrants brought here by their parents to avoid deportation and obtain work permits for two years. The advocates also want Obama to scrap Secure Communities, the controversial program that ropes local police into the enforcement of immigration law and which the Obama administration aggressively expanded to more than 1,200 jurisdictions across the country.

We’ll see about that. Many on the right insist they don’t trust Obama because they think he has gone too far in using executive power to protect the undocumented. But many on the left don’t trust him either – they don’t think he’s gone nearly far enough. Both sides have learned not to take anything this president says at face value. This is especially true when it comes to the thorny topic of immigration, where Obama finds himself in a pickle because he wants to be tough and compassionate in a debate that doesn’t allow much room for people to be both.

To show that he’s compassionate, Obama says he is willing to consider options to lessen the deportations that his own Department of Homeland Security accelerated to record numbers. It did so by eroding the discretion of federal agents and prosecutors, relying on monthly quotas and using local police as a force multiplier.

To show that he’s tough, Obama appears to be coupling his sudden conversion on deportations with a planned crackdown on the now estimated 52,000 border kids who have entered the United States in the last nine months or so. Three-fourths of these young people came from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador. These are dangerous countries where many of them were threatened with beatings, rape and even death. Still, Obama wants to send them back and he’s asking Congress for $2 billion in additional funding to speed the deportations of those children.

The president is wrapping all this together by saying that he intends to shift emphasis from the interior to the border. In other words, he is going to stop trying so hard to deport people who have been here for many years and focus instead on removing those who just arrived. Obama is driving a wedge between the “dreamers” and the border kids. Some will stay, others will go.

This doesn’t sound either compassionate or tough. It sounds cold and calculating. And that makes sense, considering the source.

Ruben Navarrette is a columnist for U-T San Diego. Reach him at [email protected]


Ruben Navarrette


Discussion | 7 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • 2realJuly 03, 2014 - 5:33 am

    As long as your a seasoned drug dealer, your good to sell. But if you just chose to become a dealer recently, you gotta go.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • DanielJuly 03, 2014 - 6:24 am

    There is record homelessness with the gap between the rich and the poor growing to it's greatest historical number all during the last 5 years, yet Obama, Pelosi, the Demos and their enabling "Progressives" fail to acknowledge the realty of the devastation that they're creating by encouraging illegal immigration by waiving the carrot of free dual citizenship and American tax-payer funded entitlement to whomever can make it across the border. They can't visualize that having new potential voters that join the other extremely low information voters in checking only "D's" on ballots that they get their hands on is not worth the devastation to this nation that it's costing us.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JagJuly 03, 2014 - 10:24 am

    Why didn't Obama pass this within the first two years when he had the whole apple?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895July 03, 2014 - 10:55 am

    Two reasons: He wanted to "play nice" with the Republicans, hoping to create some sort of reciprocity, and he wanted to spend his political capital first and foremost on health care reform.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895July 03, 2014 - 10:59 am

    Mr.S: I agree with this criticism of Obama, noting though that "cold and calculating" is still action. Your turn to say where you agree with him.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Mr. SmithJuly 03, 2014 - 12:41 pm

    Rlw: Maybe I am having trouble focusing today, but Navarette's "criticism" of Obama (that you are in agreement with) is so all over the map that I can't really agree that you get to claim points for it in our deal. I pass for now.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • clancyJuly 03, 2014 - 3:33 pm

    Has anyone seen the article on the internet today on Rick Perry's comments in the immigration crisis? I hope he fund for President he's hot my vote / support. This from a former life long democrat forma family of democrats back when they were for the working class..

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.