o'reilly column sig

State, national columnists

Christmas spirit under attack?

By From page A8 | December 24, 2012

Anyone offended by public displays of Christmas needs to see a psychiatrist. Are we clear on this? You are a loon if the sight of baby Jesus arouses anger or sadness in you. Get help.

This brings us to the governor of Rhode Island, Lincoln Chafee. He recently told me on national television that the reason he will not use the word “Christmas” in describing the state Christmas tree is that the word might offend non-Christians. The governor calls the state-purchased symbol a “holiday tree.”

My reply to the governor was that by excluding the word “Christmas,” he might be offending the 73 percent of Americans who describe themselves as Christian, not to mention the 2.2 billion Christians worldwide. Chafee chafed when he heard that but had no answer.

And then the governor did a very interesting thing: He announced the lighting of the “holiday tree” in Providence a full 30 minutes before the cord was plugged in. Very few Rhode Islanders even knew about the tree lighting because it was done so surreptitiously. Chafee did that because he feared protestors would do what they did last year: sing Christmas carols at the lighting. And we can’t have that, now, can we?

Jon Stewart and his merry band of elves will tell you that the so-called “War on Christmas” is a figment of the imagination, perhaps a result of indigestion after eating too much holiday pudding. Stewart’s posture is similar to what Ebenezer Scrooge put forth when the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come told him he was bound for hell. I am channeling Charles Dickens to see whether the ghost can visit Stewart on Christmas Eve. I’ll let you know what happens.

There is something to the argument that there are more important things to worry about than whether people like Christmas. But the assaults against the national holiday are annoying, unnecessary and often disrespectful. I mean, here’s how bad it is in this country: A pastor in Arkansas canceled a play called “Merry Christmas, Charlie Brown” because some nutty atheist objected to public school kids seeing it on church grounds. So Charlie, Snoopy and Linus were thrown under the bus by a Christian cleric. Good grief!

For all of you separation-of-church-and-state fans, here’s the deal: Jesus of Nazareth was a man. In fact, he was the most influential person ever born. A third of the world’s population has signed on to the Christian edicts: love God, and love your neighbor as yourself. That sounds like a good thing.

So, when President Grant honored Jesus by signing into law the national holiday of Christmas in 1870, the nation certified that a positive message of generosity and peace was worthy of a day off. Pretty much everybody was on board.

But not today. In our current state, the Thomas More Law Center has to litigate against attacks on Christmas every year. Anti-religion zealots put up billboards in Times Square denouncing Christmas as a “myth.” Rabid secularists bridle at any mention of Jesus or his nice mom and dad.

To them I say: Peace on Earth and tough. You don’t like the federal holiday? Try to rescind it. Start with our pal Lincoln Chafee. See how far you get with that.

And by the way, Merry Christmas to all. Even you loons.

Bill O’Reilly is host of the Fox News Show, “The O’Reilly Factor” and author of the book “Pinheads and Patriots: Where You Stand in the Age of Obama.”

Bill O'Reilly


Discussion | 3 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • rlw895December 23, 2012 - 11:54 pm

    That's right, Bill; Christians are under attack in America. They are an oppressed majority. You can look at it that way, I suppose, but the “oppression” is caused by the Constitution, specifically the First Amendment's ban on the establishment of a state religion. I say, thank goodness--and the Constitution--that our secular leaders don't side with one religion over all other beliefs. This is "oppression" with which we all can live, because reigning in a powerful majority from trying to take over means we are all more free.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksDecember 24, 2012 - 7:45 am

    rlw895, wishing you and yours a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksDecember 24, 2012 - 7:14 am

    Gee Bill, why don't you just "mail it in?" This is the same worn out, guaranteed to raise hackles argument every single year. Yeah you dressed it up a little, added a few zingers, but same crap nonetheless. There are plenty of solid examples of “good Christians” that don’t exactly “adhere to policy,” let’s be real here! There are conflicts in this country everyday and many as silly as those you speak to, but the majority of Americans recognize their uselessness and laugh it off. Because we get it Sir, Christmas regardless of how you care to address it aint going anywhere, period. Bottom line? People, most people including atheists spend money at Christmas too. They may not celebrate for the same reasons, but they do celebrate and the kids, the families and the economy benefit, and for the most part are probably very happy. So what’s the big deal? I’d much rather encounter anybody wishing me a joyous day regardless of how they phrase it. The season brings happiness and good will and no matter how you present it or where that comes from, I’ll take it. Merry Christmas AND Happy Holidays, hope that covers it? :)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.