FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA

Pulse poll

Question of the week: Should Suisun City fluoridate its water?

By From page A7 | February 28, 2013

Suisun City leaders are discussing fluoridating the city’s water supply, ending its tenure as one of two Solano County cities (Dixon is the other) that don’t do that.

What do you think? Participate in this week’s poll:


Last week’s results

Do you agree with the Solano County district attorney’s decision to seek the death penalty for the homicide of Jim Capoot?

Yes: 81 percent

No: 19 percent

107 Daily Republic voters

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 7 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • The MisterFebruary 24, 2013 - 8:21 am

    (another attempt to post) Fluoride is put into the water to treat a medical condition. For the City to put fluoride in the water is for the City to practice medicine... without a license. Oh, but you say, "We're just following orders" from the CDC or EPA. Just like the N-a-z-i-s were following orders by dropping Zyklon B on the J-e-w-s.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • John in SuiusnFebruary 26, 2013 - 4:28 pm

    A little over the top there sir. Surely you can find a more current analogy than something that happened 70 years ago and has nothing to do with this article.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • The MisterFebruary 28, 2013 - 12:41 pm

    With government approval, doctors had no problem issuing out thalidomide to pregnant women; "Don't worry, it's good for you." Suffer the children. Over the top? Ask the deformed babies... ask their mothers.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • George Guynn, JrMarch 05, 2013 - 10:56 am

    Most of the fluoride will go to landscape and end up in the marsh. As The Mister says, we don't need medication from two bit politicians with no medical license or consent from the public to put rat poison in our water!!!! Fluoride has been stopped two times already. How much taxpayer money must be wasted till the politicians realize NO means NO?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dr. Richard SauerheberMarch 13, 2013 - 6:49 pm

    The U.S. CDC published that systemic fluoride from the blood does not lower tooth caries (MMWD, Aug, 2001) and suggested it must work topically. The National Research Council 2006 however reported that fluoride in saliva from consumed water is only 0.02 ppm, 75,000 times less concentrated than in toothpaste at 1,500. Ingesting industrial fluoride is useless for this purpose. Fluoride is not a mineral nutrient and has never been approved for ingestion by the U.S. FDA, and the sale of fluoride intended for ingestion by pregnant women was banned by the FDA in 1966. Please watch the brief 4 minute TV news broadcast by Abby Martin in Washington D.C. on Youtube. Type in Abby Martin Fluoride for her honest lay description–it is excellent.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • NassabscheiderMay 20, 2013 - 11:30 pm

    Excellent work! This is the style of details that happen to be should be shared around the web. A sense of shame on the internet because of not placing the following offered larger! Can occur more than in addition to take a look at the website. Thanks Means)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895May 21, 2013 - 12:42 am

    You need to keep working on your English. Where do you live anyway?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.