Governors across the country have line-item-veto powers to help keep state spending in check. Presidents – Republicans and Democrats – have sought similar authority from Congress, to no avail.
Not so this year.
As the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration loomed, Congress offered the president the authority to decide how the required spending cuts should be achieved.
The president said no. Instead, he chose the meat cleaver approach found in the failed budget deal of 2011.
We know how government operates: When money is tight, politicians threaten cuts to things people care about. It’s a ploy to get what they want, which is typically more of our hard-earned money. There’s little or no effort to cut spending on programs that are less popular or downright wasteful.
Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma refers to his “Waste Book 2012″ as a starting point for prudent spending cuts. His list includes:
Closer to home, researchers at San Diego State University and UC Davis spent part of a $325,000 National Science Foundation grant to build a robotic squirrel, to see if a fake squirrel could scare off rattlesnakes as effectively as their flesh-and-blood counterparts.
Is that truly necessary spending, given that civilian workers at Travis Air Force Base may soon lose 20 percent of their income?
So as the Obama administration pushes furloughs of civilian Department of Defense workers, releases criminals set for deportation – by the thousands, and pulls air traffic controllers out of airport towers to save money – including those who work in the tower at Napa County Regional Airport, others are looking at spending cuts through the lens of waste, fraud and abuse.
That’s where cuts should be made.
The president could make those cuts, but doesn’t want the responsibility. As a result, the country sits, waiting for the next ax to fall while federal dollars continue to pay for such things as a game app that allows people to relive the experience of high school prom week.
The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
G-ManMarch 17, 2013 - 7:29 am
.....Mm obama is a coward..a spoiled little man who was never said no to...and the low information voters who re-elected him..won't even rue the day...they'll blame their upcoming plight on others of course..anybody except themselves and their raison de etre
Reply |Rich GiddensMarch 17, 2013 - 7:56 am
Where is your Congressman and State Assembly leadership in all of this government treachery, fraud, waste, abuse on steroids? They see nothing wrong as they shovel money at both guns and butter---for those of you in Suisun that means defense and social spending. We have a dumbed down society with low information voters who get their pseudo facts from the government media complex and the over-the-top biased TV news that takes the government's side on every issue.
Reply |atc1990March 17, 2013 - 9:21 am
Oh man. While the two programs you highlighted are indeed a complete waste of money, you REALLY need to do some research on how the Sequester came about and how it could be avoided. Because wow you are WAY off base...
Reply |rlw895March 19, 2013 - 12:09 am
This argument doesn't fly. Just because you can identify a few million dollars of presumably wasteful programs doesn't mean Obama should take up the Republican's kind offer to find over $80 billion in cuts on his own. I think we can assume that if congress gave Obama the authority to make $40 billion in cuts while offering to either drop the remaining sequester or raise new revenues to relieve the remaining sequester, he would take the deal.
Reply |