Our view

Few thousand troops in Afghanistan same as withdrawal

If reports are true that the Obama administration is considering reducing U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan to 3,000 at the end of 2014, the U.S. presence there would be effectively over. The war that began there in 2001 would end.

The White House has hinted that absent an agreement with the government of Hamid Karzai or its successor, the U.S. and its coalition allies might even pull out all troops when the U.N .mandate for their presence expires at the end of 2014.

A similar impasse over a status of forces agreement in Iraq – the right of U.S. troops to conduct independent combat missions with immunity from local law – led to the earlier-than-planned withdrawal of the U.S. military there.

It is probably fair to say to say that the American public, at least that dwindling few who still pay attention to this war, would not be brokenhearted if we pull completely out of Afghanistan.

There are 66,000 American troops there now, methodically turning over their outlying bases to the Afghan army which still needs substantial U.S. support, including supplies, transport and intelligence.

The NATO commanders seem agreed that a residual force of, at a minimum, 10,000 to 30,000 troops is needed to protect the status quo and continue training and equipping the Afghan security forces. A force of 3,000 to 6,000 could protect Kabul and the vital Bagram air base and not much else.

A stay-behind force of 3,000 is almost the same as no presence at all. At best that size force might prevent another Benghazi; at worst, it would provide an escort sufficient to spirit a pro-U.S. government to the airport as the Taliban and assorted warlords closed in on the capital.

Scripps Howard News Service


Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • BennyJanuary 11, 2013 - 8:44 am

    Leaving 3,000 troops permanently is the same as a full withdrawal? Is this more of Obama-speak, sort of like his media quest to aledgely "soak the rich", a ruse and diversion away from the 50% SS increase on poor workers, while knowingly full well that the rich will continue to pay whatever they want to regardless of token tax rate increases without a change in the tax code?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.