No. The Commission assumed the official story was true. It was starved of resources and its report was mostly based on the original 2001 FBI probe under the control of leading neocon Michael Chertoff, a political appointee at the Department of Justice. The Commission did however find out some interesting details which it failed to investigate further, notably the Pentagon’s anti-hijack exercise running on the day of the attacks, and alleged 9/11 ringleader Khaled Sheikh Mohammed’s links with the US-allied Northern Alliance. The Commission’s report is also of interest to some researchers for its omissions. For instance there is no clear eyewitness evidence from ground staff that the alleged 9/11 hijackers boarded the planes and no explanation for 20 minutes of total inaction by the operational leadership in the Pentagon at the height of the attacks…………..

Was the 911 Commission independent?…

No. The commission was established as an arm of the executive branch. All of its personnel were long-standing Washington political operatives from the centre ground, with the exception of Commissioner Cleland, who resigned in disgust calling it a “whitewash” and a “national scandal”. Several members had glaring conflicts of interest. All investigators reported to Executive director Phillip Zelikow. Zelikow was a consultant to the Bush White House and only months earleir had helped with the appointments of the key security officials under investigation. He was a close associate of Condoleeza Rice before and after the attacks and authored the 2002 National Security strategy outlining the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war………………

If the official story was wrong the media would have told us….

History shows this is not true, there are many instances of the media parroting government lies when they should have known better. In recent years the media have become more concentrated and easier to control. There are hundreds of thousands of people in the US for whom state secrecy is part of their job – leaks are rare. The media might have been told that at a time of war they had to co-operate in hiding embarrassing mistakes made by the CIA or the Pentagon. It is possible that secrets about 9/11 are kept from the public by “superinjunctions” where courts order that even the existence of an injunction must be kept secret………wwwreinvestigate911org

SCHUMER, AS CHAIRMAN OF JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES, LAUNCHES CONSTRUCTION OF 2013 INAUGURAL PLATFORM AT FIRST NAIL CEREMONY ………The First Nail Ceremony occurs every four years to mark the official launch of construction of the Inaugural platform where the President of the United States will take the oath of office. The 57th Presidential Inauguration will occur on Monday, January 21, 2013. When the platform is completed, it will hold approximately 1,600 Inaugural guests including Members of the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives, Cabinet Members, Justices of the Supreme Court, former Presidents and the President and Vice President and their families. The ceremony takes place at the United States Capitol and involves members of the Joint Committee…………

Schumer, alongside other Members of the Joint Committee and the Architect of the Capitol, today hammered nails into a plank at the side of the future Inaugural platform. At the ceremony, Schumer used the hardhat of Mark Gajewski, a construction worker from Long Island who risked his life on 9/11 and later passed away of lung cancer from his efforts during the site cleanup. Mr. Gajewski was a Marine and member of the Operational Engineers Local 30 who rushed to the towers after they fell and spent months onsite sorting through and cleaning up the wreckage………..

Schumer also used a hammer that belongs to Michael Berlingo, a carpenter currently working on 1 World Trade Center.(Posters Note Very funny evil people get it ONE WORLD Trade Center, and yes they know who did the evil deed) Michael Berlingo is a former Marine Sergeant in the sniper division and later became a carpenter with the New York City District Council of Carpenters. He has worked as a carpenter foreman on Tower 1 of the World Trade Center for the last five years, and his hammer has been at the site from cleanup at Ground Zero to placing the roof of the new Freedom tower………From Mr. Schumer’s Senate Website Schumer dot senate dot gov

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Statement On The Floor of The United States Senate In Response to the World Trade Center and Pentagon Attacks.September 12, 2001…………

We also stand united behind our resolve — as this resolution so clearly states — to recover and rebuild in the aftermath of these tragic acts. You know, New York was not an accidental choice for these madmen, these terrorists, and these instruments of evil. They deliberately chose to strike at a city, which is a global city — it is the city of the Twenty First century, it epitomizes who we are as Americans. And so this in a very real sense was an attack on America, on our values, on our power, and on who we are as a people. And I know (Yes Hillary a lot of us know that you “know”)— because I know America — that America will stand behind New York. That America will offer whatever resources, aid, comfort, support that New Yorkers and New York require. Because the greatest rebuke we can offer to those who attack our way of life is to demonstrate clearly that we are not cowed in any way whatsoever………….

I hope that within a short period, Senator Warner, we will see scaffolding on the sides of the Pentagon after we finish the search and recovery work that is being carried out heroically. I hope we all see a clear signal that we are rebuilding and our defenses are more resolute than ever. I hope similarly that lower Manhattan has the same kind of image of project (Very funny..PNAC = Project for a New American Century) because the reality will be that we are rebuilding and reconstructing and making clear that just as our military might is unchallenged and un-cowed so is our economics, our social, our political values epitomized by New York. (our = Illuminati, epitomized by a successful PSYOP)

Motive – Peak Oil: At some point between 2000 and 2007, world oil production reaches its peak; from that point on, every barrel of oil is going to be harder to find, more expensive to recover, and more valuable to those who recover and control it. Dick Cheney was well aware of the coming Peak Oil crisis at least as early as 1999, and 9/11 provided the pretext for the series of energy wars that Cheney stated, “will not end in our lifetime.” (Click here for a summary of these points)……

Opportunity – 9/11 War Games: The Air Force was running multiple war games on the morning of 9/11 simulating hijackings over the continental United States that included (at least) one “live-fly” exercise as well as simulations that placed “false blips” on FAA radar screens. These war games eerily mirrored the real events of 9/11 to the point of the Air Force running drills involving hijacked aircraft as the 9/11 plot actually unfolded. The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter jocks – who had trained their entire lives for this moment – would be able to prevent the attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney’s management. (Click here for a summary of these points)………..

But real over-all motive is Illuminati goal of a one world order. Why did they build up China as the manufacturing center. The money to fund the factories of China came from the Rothschild banks, BTW China has a central bank also.

Back then, the British supporters used the power of their established forces (military, economic and rule of law) to preserve their control. The “freedom” promoters back then used propaganda and guerulla tactics to persuade enough of the ambivalent to the virtue of their cause… or, more likely, to the uncertain fear of what might happen if they don’t throw in with the “freedom” movement. And you have the mushy mass in the middle who were ambivalent for the most part and only moved on the margins………….

Today you have the “establishment” supporters, such as Piers Morgan and countless others in the mainstream media. You also have the “freedom” promoters; they may begin from an organic desire to warn others and fight against “the establishment”, but in fact when, as groups, they become of any notice to the “establishment”, they are either made impotent or co-opted. Also, many groups that may seem to be righteous freedom-promoting groups are in fact crafted propaganda machines. And of course we still have the mushy mass in the middle who are even more distracted by pleasures of the flesh than those from 240 years ago…………….

Interestingly, the “freedom” promoters back then have a striking connection to the “establishment” of today… the merchantilists or, today, mega-corps… which obviously include financial and banking corporations. The difference today is that the “establishment” not only uses their established forces (military, economic and rule of law) but also second leg of the triad, the “freedom” promoters (don’t they want a return to the rule of law we call the Constitution?) and they exert influence over the last segment of the triad, the ambivalent people, through the media, the dumbing-down via state-run education, chemical poisoning, etc……………….

Back during the revolutionary time, we are taught that it was the good guys pushed to the limits who fought back and won against the bad guys. In reality, it was the bad guys (who might look like good guys from a cursory glance) fighting the other bad guys over control of the resources in this new land… to include the people. Today it is the bad buys (who might look like the good guys from a cursory glance) fighting the other bad guys over control of the resources in this country… to include the people. Meet the new boss… same as the old boss…………..

To participate in the dialectic is to promote and further the purposes of those who established this dialectic. You are not bound to their established forces… military (police-state, tyranny, dictatorial law from the executive branch), economic (debt-based, national, world currency) nor their rule of law (founded on some interpretation of the Constitution and then interpretation of those interpretations… legislating case law from the judicial bench). You are bound, whether you want to be or not, to Natural Law… (to paraphrase) All people are Created equal (by a Creator) with ALL rights and responsibilities that cannot lawfully be limited or taken away except by the application of Natural Law. Yes, the “establishment” can and does limit and strip your rights and usurp your responsibilities… but they do not do so lawfully………….

So, as a baseline to judge whether your beliefs and efforts are working to make a change for freedom or if you are furthering the “establishment” system of enslavement of the people, even with a smiley face, compare your efforts and the results to those of Natural Law. If what you believe and do are congruent with Natural Law, then you are doing good. If, on the other hand, it is not in line with Natural Law, then it must be supportive of tyranny. (For instance, Tea Parties that will not question the official narrative on 9-11 or hold that it is reasonable that “assault” weapons be banned; or, holding the notion that Republicans must be elected and Democrats voted out because at least it’s a step in the right direction… the lesser of two evils–but it’s still evil and it furthers the dialectic… and supports the “establishment”.)

The problems before us may be different, but the key to solving them remains the same. It is the individual — the individual who steps forward. And the state of our Union is the union of each of us, one to the other — the sum of our friendships, marriages, families, and communities………

We all have something to give. So, if you know how to read, find someone who can’t………… If you’ve got a hammer, find a nail…….(Posters Note, Yes they nailed us really good with 911 WICH WAS AN INSIDE JOB)….. If you’re not hungry, not lonely, not in trouble, seek out someone who is. Join the community of conscience. Do the hard work of freedom. And that will define the state of our Union…………wwwpresidency dot ucsb dot edu/ws/index.php?pid=19253

- The speech, given at the U of Del.in 1992, was entitled “On the Threshold of the New World Order: A Rebirth for the United Nations”……….

- In it he said, “in setting an American agenda for a New World Order, we must begin with a profound alteration in traditional thought”………..

- “Representatives of the United Nations should be used to monitor the dismantling of the weapons, he said. “We should cut the Gordianknot of difficult dismantlement by acting immediately to sequester allwarheads to be eliminated” (Remind you of anybody from Texas?)…………..

- THE WORST PART (IMHO) “He said the United States and other countries should commit military forces to exclusive use by the United Nations’ Security Council, which would enforce nuclear agreements”……………

- Biden stressed that, if nuclear containment efforts fail, the United States “must be able to use force to stop rogue nations like North Korea” from collecting additional weapons of mass destruction…………….

- The “New World Order” also should include a new role for NATO, he said………….

- “NATO should abandon its anachronistic posture-the defense of allied territory against direct attack-to make a great leap forward and adopt peace-keeping outside NATO territory as a formal alliance mission,”………….wwwudel dot edu/PR/UpDate/93/9/19 dot html

As a White House emissary, Kerry has tamped down diplomatic fires for Obama. He also has stepped ahead of the administration on a handful of crises. KERRY JOINED SEN. JOHN McCAIN R-Ariz., as an early proponent of a more aggressive policy toward Libya, pushing for using military forces to impose a “no-fly zone” over Libya as Muammar Qaddafi’s forces killed rebels and other citizens. [Posters Note–The true story of Lybia has not beern told the International Bankers/NWO took out Qaddafi for oil and setting up a national Lybian Bank)……..He was one of the early voices calling for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to step down as revolution roiled the nation two years ago………….

During his tenure, Kerry has pushed for reducing the number of nuclear weapons, shepherding a U.S.-Russia treaty through the Senate in December 2010, and has cast climate change as a national security threat, joining forces (see just political theater, they “switch” sides whenever they need the votes) with Republicans on legislation that faced too many obstacles to win congressional passage………….

He has led delegations to Syria and met a few times with President Bashar Assad, now a pariah in U.S. eyes after months of civil war and bloodshed as the government looks to put down a people’s rebellion. Figuring out an end-game for the Middle East country would demand all of Kerry’s skills. Remember the mid-east and African wars are to take control of mineral resources, to depopulate countries and consolidate coutries under NWO control.

The selection of Kerry closes a political circle with Obama. In 2004, it was White House hopeful Kerry who asked a largely unknown Illinois state senator to deliver the keynote address at the Democratic convention in Boston, handing the national stage to Obama. Kerry lost that election to President George W. Bush. Four years later, Obama was the White House hopeful who succeeded where Kerry had failed……….Google…Senate approves Kerry for secretary of state associated press..Published January 29, 2013 wwwfoxnewscom backslash politics backslash2013/01/29 back slash senate-panel-approves-kerry-nomination-for-secretary-state/……….

Hey Mike I think maybe they got this one right, as far as correct reporting (if one reads between the lines)