FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA
stevenson column sig 2

Local opinion columnists

What lessons from Iraq?

By From page A11 | June 13, 2014

No, I don’t think we can blame this one on President Barack Obama.

What is happening in Iraq is an enormous history lesson. We patiently, and with a great cost in lives, rid Iraq of a vicious dictator. Do you remember when Gen. Colin Powell stood at a briefing map and made his stern, “muscular” speech about the destruction of the Iraqi forces on what became known as the Highway of Death?

Saddam Hussein had invaded Kuwait, but his armored forces wanted out once we got involved. Our air power versus their ground forces was almost an unfair fight. It took but one night to wipe out hundreds of Iraqi vehicles skittering from Kuwait up, of all things, Highway 80 back to their home turf. It was one of the most dramatic displays of air power in history.

The swift killing of the Iraqi invasion force was followed by more fighting, not only in Iraq, but then in Afghanistan. Although allied (the British fought with us) casualties were “light,” if you want to use an inadequate word, in the first round, that couldn’t be said of the later years of involvement in both countries. It turned out that our massive armor and air power were not enough to destroy the Taliban. We did destroy the Taliban rule in Afghanistan, but, as we all know, the guerilla forces, or terrorists as some call them, proved a tougher fight.

We did, however, think we had a reasonably stable government, if you want to call it that, in Iraq. We didn’t think Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi president, was the ideal leader of an unstable country, but he was the best we could do. Al-Maliki became president as a result of the spilling of a lot of American – and Iraqi – blood. Just a few days ago, President Obama talked proudly of our troop withdrawal from Iraq, who were leaving with their mission accomplished. Yes, that was a phrase used prematurely by President George W. Bush, but it reflected the Washington consensus that our job was – for the most part – done.

So what do we call what happened in Iraq last week?

Can we admit that, in a perverse way, the militants, whoever they are, staged an invasion almost as impressive as our original attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan? How did that happen after almost 15 years of costly involvement in both countries?

Perhaps there is a lesson we should have learned; the hostility between Sunni and Shia runs deeper and more dangerously than we had believed. Does it also mean that we can’t ignore the heart of the western world’s oil supply, but that we have to be much more alert to what is boiling up beneath the surface?

History tells us that sometimes there is no strategy that will make every vital area of the world safe for American interests. No, that doesn’t mean that we should become isolationists – just more cautious interventionists. The cross-border attack in Iraq, and the possible capture of Mosul and Tikrit, and maybe even Baghdad, may be a disaster beyond our control, or even influence.

Bud Stevenson, a retired stockbroker, lives in Fairfield. Reach him at [email protected]

Bud Stevenson

Bud Stevenson

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 5 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • DanielJune 13, 2014 - 6:12 am

    The lesson Iraq leader Maliki is just another Obama and the inevitable results will follow, his actions or in actions have destroyed Iraq just like Obama is destroying the US.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rick WoodJune 13, 2014 - 7:54 am

    The lesson is Kerry was right. The only was to have a stable Iraq is either with a brutal a repressive dictator like Saddam or partition the country. After our naive neo-conservative regime removed Saddam, they thought Iraq would welcome western democratic ideals and that would address factionalism. Not so. But it was politically expedient to pretend like it was so. We are now getting a stable region that was once Iraq, made up of Arab Shiite, Arab Sunni, and Kurdish zones. We can only hope to remove the ISIS influence over the Arab-Sunni zone, and that should be the sole objective if the international community.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rick WoodJune 13, 2014 - 7:55 am

    *way

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Danny BuntinJune 13, 2014 - 10:08 pm

    "Perhaps there is a lesson we should have learned; the hostility between Sunni and Shia runs deeper and more dangerously than we had believed.". Bologna, we knew this from the get go back in 1990. It is kind of funny to me, that we are building a coalition with Iran in order to resolve this issue.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • rlw895June 13, 2014 - 10:11 pm

    Do you think Cheney, Rumsfeld, and their minions knew it? Bush only knew what they told him.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.