FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA
faison column sig

Local opinion columnists

Voting cycle question worthy of debate

By From page A8 | February 17, 2013

Solano County Supervisors John Vasquez and Jim Spering have asked Fairfield City Council members to consider moving from odd-year elections to even-year elections, a request that if approved will extend the terms of current council members and could help create a domino effect among the numerous school districts and special district that now have odd-year voting.

The question to consider is: Is odd-year voting an oddity?

Spering and Vasquez point to election trends to help justify their request. Specifically, the pair note that Fairfield had a voter turnout of 24 percent in November 2011, when two City Council seats were filled, compared to a voter turnout in Fairfield of 72 percent in November 2012 when Measure P was on the ballot along with state, congressional and presidential contests.

The rationale is sound and extends beyond Fairfield. Voter turnout countywide for recent presidential elections shows strong overall participation – 77 percent in 2004, 85 percent in 2008 and 73 percent in 2012 – compared to midterm races during the same period – 65 percent in 2006 and 62 percent in 2010. Off-cycle voter participation drops off even more – 57 percent in 2005, 36 percent in 2007, 29 percent in 2009 and 27 percent in 2011.

Fairfield voters had another sales tax measure on the 2005 ballot in Measure E, which was defeated and likely drew voter participation. Local ballot measures two years later – Measure Q on water taxes and fees and Measure R on Rockville Hills Regional Park land use – look to have increased voter participation somewhat that year as well. Those voter turnout spikes still fall far below totals for midterm congressional election years.

Officials with local schools districts, cities and special districts may believe it’s better to have elections in off years so their respective races are not lost on what’s already a crowded ballot. There’s also the notion that it’s easier for candidates to marshal their supporters in odd-year elections, and that those elections are less affected by the partisanship that’s present in even-year elections. I can understand that thinking.

That or similar logic may very well have led Fairfield to switch to odd-year elections starting with the 1987 vote. The city also switched from April to November voting at that time.

At a certain point, however, maintaining such an off-year election cycle may cost more than it’s worth, given that the cost of each election is paid by those governments that have races on the ballot. If Fairfield, Vallejo and Benicia switch to even-year elections, it may cost the remaining governments – mostly schools and special districts – too much to continue odd-year elections.

Maybe that’s a good thing.

An argument can be made that it’s more efficient to have consolidated elections that coincide with the congressional and presidential election calendars. Who doesn’t want more efficient government? Recent history also shows there’s stronger voter participation in those years when compared to odd-year elections.

If Fairfield bites, all current council members and the mayor will see their terms extended by a year to move to an even-year voting cycle.

It’s a good time to consider such a move. Mayor Harry Price won in a landslide in the 2009 election, so adding a year to his current term seems simple. Councilman John Mraz and Councilwoman Catherine Moy won their respective seats in 2009, and the next closest contender that year, Pam Bertani, won a seat in 2011. Councilman Rick Vaccaro also won in 2011, so he also has fresh voter support.

Any candidates who are waiting in the wings for this year’s city elections would be forced to wait one more year. That’s not an overly long wait in the world of local politics, where the lay of the land can shift two or three times in as many months.

The City Council will take up the request Tuesday. It’s a discussion that’s worth having.

Reach Managing Editor Glen Faison at 427-6925 or [email protected] Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/GlenFaison.

This version corrects the spelling of Councilman Rick Vaccaro’s last name.

Glen Faison

Glen Faison

Glen Faison joined the Daily Republic as managing editor in September 2009. He previously worked as a reporter and editor for daily and weekly newspapers in the San Joaquin Valley for 20-plus years. His experience includes time as editor of the Golden Eagle, a military paper serving the Lemoore Naval Air Station. He graduated from Fresno State University with a bachelor's degree in journalism and bleeds Bulldogs red. He is an avid fan of the NFL's Washington team, and attended the 1988 NFC Championship Game against the Minnesota Vikings at RFK Stadium. He's a member of the Fairfield-Suisun Twilight Rotary Club and a board member for the Solano County Library Foundation. He married his wife, Jill, in 2005, and has three children: Courtni, Tyler and Hayli.
LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 6 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • StR...What I want everyone to KnowFebruary 17, 2013 - 12:38 pm

    Speaking of John Vasquez and Jim Spering are they the only county supervisors on the Board of the Solano 360 Fairgrounds project, are they on this board? Who is on the board of the Fairgrounds project, is it these Supervisors and two Vallejo city council people? The 360 Fair grounds project really deserves some good investigative reporting. Much money has already been spent on Consultants that maybe have failed to deliver. Also I thought we were trying to bridge a fiscal gap county wise, why are we pusuing this now? I t seems the decision making process is in the hands of a small circle of people with no real input from the citizenry. Much, much money stands to be spent and wasted. Who is it that really wants this project? Who is really behind this project? A lot of us would appreciate some answers to these questions. Thank You There are also questions about who is benefiting from the sale of lands associated with the new Train Station off of Peabody road. or the possilbe increase?, in value of land close to the location. Also what about the businesses that might be dislocated due to the train station project, that many of us do not want.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • ContinuedFebruary 17, 2013 - 12:43 pm

    Also funding for the project seems merky. Two different types of bond funding are being discussed? With one method, since Vallejo is bankrupt, the collateral for the bonds is the land itself which would be ceded to the developer, if financial probelems arise? See all of this development is very questionable.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • StR More info on 360February 17, 2013 - 2:30 pm

    Go here...http://www.co.solano.ca.us/ and click on the 360 project.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • StR More info on 360February 17, 2013 - 2:56 pm

    www dot co dot solano dot ca dot us and click on the 360 project. But it takes a lot of time for just an average citizen to wade through all this and really get the big picture of what is going on. It looks to me like we are spending tons of money on a big park? How is this funded? Follow the money. What true economic advantage is this project to Vallejo and Solano County, not just projections, reality as best we can tell? What about costs of upkeep in the future? It seems to me that Vallejo should be very very careful, the city can not afford to make any more mistakes at this point, since it is already in Bankrupcy. We as a county should move very slowly in analyzing our options here.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • StRFebruary 17, 2013 - 4:06 pm

    Here is an idea...Hold the county fair at the Dixon Fairgrounds and just out right sell the current Fair site in Vallejo? Divide the money to help Vallejo out of Bankruptcy and to rebuild Solano County Reserves? Just an idea to look at, maybe not a good one.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Steven KaysFebruary 19, 2013 - 10:31 pm

    Interesting behind the scenes activity on this issue.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.