<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Fox News 2012 continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/</link>
	<description>Solano County&#039;s Breaking News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:09:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Chalk another question 4 U...</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980273</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Chalk another question 4 U...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you familiar w/the The Hegelian Dialectic which is basically Problem -- Reaction -- Solution.  Google...Illuminati Hegelian Dialectic.  THEY create a problem = School Shootings.....Reaction THEY get everyone righteously upset.....Solution THEY propose Gun Control laws and confiscations which was the NWO goal all along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you familiar w/the The Hegelian Dialectic which is basically Problem &#8212; Reaction &#8212; Solution.  Google&#8230;Illuminati Hegelian Dialectic.  THEY create a problem = School Shootings&#8230;..Reaction THEY get everyone righteously upset&#8230;..Solution THEY propose Gun Control laws and confiscations which was the NWO goal all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So MRC and/or Mr. Chalk a ?</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980255</link>
		<dc:creator>So MRC and/or Mr. Chalk a ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you think Sandy Hook could be a Government PsyOp?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Sandy Hook could be a Government PsyOp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We need to resist the power structure</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980253</link>
		<dc:creator>We need to resist the power structure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is at the top, both Democrat and Republican because really they are the same and ultimatly have the same NWO New World Order goals, think of it as a Tag Team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is at the top, both Democrat and Republican because really they are the same and ultimatly have the same NWO New World Order goals, think of it as a Tag Team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRC</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980251</link>
		<dc:creator>MRC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So whats your point Mike?  Just because there are  5,270,000 listings of every conceivable combination of the words &quot;obama staged sandy hook fox news&quot; shouldn&#039;t surprise anyone.  However if you bracket it in quotes guess how many hits.  If you pick just 1 you are a winner. Oh and guess what its your column!  You seem to think that big numbers and large volume of words will convince anyone.  That&#039;s only true for those that are addicted to you kool-aid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So whats your point Mike?  Just because there are  5,270,000 listings of every conceivable combination of the words &#8220;obama staged sandy hook fox news&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t surprise anyone.  However if you bracket it in quotes guess how many hits.  If you pick just 1 you are a winner. Oh and guess what its your column!  You seem to think that big numbers and large volume of words will convince anyone.  That&#8217;s only true for those that are addicted to you kool-aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Fox put the guest on the Air?</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980250</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Fox put the guest on the Air?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now maybe Mr. Obama did not personally plan the Sandy Hook PsyOp, but somewhere in the Government Black Propaganda Matrix some high level operative did.  The Guest was getting noticed so they set out to denounce him and to feed the public again the line that this is a nut, a conspiracy, go home no show here, do not pay attention to this info, IT IS DAMAGE CONTROL.  Sandy Hook was a PsyOps.   Also when we get into again arguing Dem vs Repub it distracts from the real info...which is Sandy Hook was a PsyOp, and who did it and why (Why = gun control, part of advancing the Illuminati plan for the NWO) You know though they can play this so many different ways, if they do not get the guns, they can still set off Helter Skelter PsyOps such as Black against White against Hispanic or just whenever a food shortage hits we will all be armed and will be doing the Depopluation for the Illuminati in that we will be shooting and killing each other off. BUT I think it is better to keep the Guns.  Also what happens in a crisis, you might actually need the gun to hunt for food, or to protect yourself from gangs, or in a true deep crisis there will not be enough food to feed pets, we will have to be shooting stray dogs ect...Think Mad Max Time. Anyway If Senator Feinstein is for gun control then I am against it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now maybe Mr. Obama did not personally plan the Sandy Hook PsyOp, but somewhere in the Government Black Propaganda Matrix some high level operative did.  The Guest was getting noticed so they set out to denounce him and to feed the public again the line that this is a nut, a conspiracy, go home no show here, do not pay attention to this info, IT IS DAMAGE CONTROL.  Sandy Hook was a PsyOps.   Also when we get into again arguing Dem vs Repub it distracts from the real info&#8230;which is Sandy Hook was a PsyOp, and who did it and why (Why = gun control, part of advancing the Illuminati plan for the NWO) You know though they can play this so many different ways, if they do not get the guns, they can still set off Helter Skelter PsyOps such as Black against White against Hispanic or just whenever a food shortage hits we will all be armed and will be doing the Depopluation for the Illuminati in that we will be shooting and killing each other off. BUT I think it is better to keep the Guns.  Also what happens in a crisis, you might actually need the gun to hunt for food, or to protect yourself from gangs, or in a true deep crisis there will not be enough food to feed pets, we will have to be shooting stray dogs ect&#8230;Think Mad Max Time. Anyway If Senator Feinstein is for gun control then I am against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chalk</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980234</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike:  I can not validate my claim after the fact, so I will have to back off on what I said and apologize.  Having said that, however, you can be assured that I do not make stuff up (i.e., lie) or try to fool people.  I will leave that to some others on this site.  You do understand, don&#039;t you, that your attempt to slime Fox News by association is readily transparent to all of us?  Even if you did slide the term &quot;guest&quot; into your editorial.  Your follow-ups to posters on this site are largely absent that clarifying term, resulting in your final lame accusation that Fox purposely put that fraudulent guest on the air hoping to trick their viewers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  I can not validate my claim after the fact, so I will have to back off on what I said and apologize.  Having said that, however, you can be assured that I do not make stuff up (i.e., lie) or try to fool people.  I will leave that to some others on this site.  You do understand, don&#8217;t you, that your attempt to slime Fox News by association is readily transparent to all of us?  Even if you did slide the term &#8220;guest&#8221; into your editorial.  Your follow-ups to posters on this site are largely absent that clarifying term, resulting in your final lame accusation that Fox purposely put that fraudulent guest on the air hoping to trick their viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I must admit I...</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980226</link>
		<dc:creator>I must admit I...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do not know much about the &quot;Progressive Movement&quot;.  Who are the current leaders of the Progressive Movement and are they separate from Democrat leadership?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not know much about the &#8220;Progressive Movement&#8221;.  Who are the current leaders of the Progressive Movement and are they separate from Democrat leadership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike kirchubel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980213</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike kirchubel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 01:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom, what are you talking about?  I realize i cant ever penetrate your bubble, but please dont just make stuff up And pretend its true.  Not everybody is as gullible as you may think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, what are you talking about?  I realize i cant ever penetrate your bubble, but please dont just make stuff up And pretend its true.  Not everybody is as gullible as you may think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today Sunday on....</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980131</link>
		<dc:creator>Today Sunday on....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wwwinfowars....On the Sunday, January 20 edition of the Alex Jones Show, we feature some our most powerful interviews of 2013, including our recent discussion with former Congressman Ron Paul where he described a scenario in which Americans turn in their guns as a “line in the sand.” We&#039;ll also hear former Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives, author and staunch pro-Second Amendment advocate Suzanna Hupp&#039;s thoughts on the feverish attempts to demonize gun-owners in the wake of the Newtown tragedy. Today&#039;s broadcast will also feature one of our most popular interviews to date, our in-studio chat with Michelle Dowery, better known as the Obama Phone Lady.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wwwinfowars&#8230;.On the Sunday, January 20 edition of the Alex Jones Show, we feature some our most powerful interviews of 2013, including our recent discussion with former Congressman Ron Paul where he described a scenario in which Americans turn in their guns as a “line in the sand.” We&#8217;ll also hear former Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives, author and staunch pro-Second Amendment advocate Suzanna Hupp&#8217;s thoughts on the feverish attempts to demonize gun-owners in the wake of the Newtown tragedy. Today&#8217;s broadcast will also feature one of our most popular interviews to date, our in-studio chat with Michelle Dowery, better known as the Obama Phone Lady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Wikipedia...George Lakoff</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980024</link>
		<dc:creator>From Wikipedia...George Lakoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Lakoff....One of his political works, Don&#039;t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, self-labeled as &quot;the Essential Guide for Progressives&quot;, was published in September 2004 and features a foreword by former Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.....Posters Note...THE REALLY SCARY THING IS THAT NO ONE GETS TO THE NATIONAL DEBATE STAGE WITH OUT THE ILLUMINATI OK-ING IT.........   This includes people like Huckabee and Santorum.  It also made me doubt even Ron Paul...BTW We cannot return to a GOLD/SILVER standard it just will not work...Web of Debt by Ellen Brown, Vile Acts of Evil by Mike Kirchubel and No More National Debt by Bill Still point this out, we cannot return to a gold standard.  PS  READ REVELATION IN THE BIBLE...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Lakoff&#8230;.One of his political works, Don&#8217;t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, self-labeled as &#8220;the Essential Guide for Progressives&#8221;, was published in September 2004 and features a foreword by former Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean&#8230;..Posters Note&#8230;THE REALLY SCARY THING IS THAT NO ONE GETS TO THE NATIONAL DEBATE STAGE WITH OUT THE ILLUMINATI OK-ING IT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;   This includes people like Huckabee and Santorum.  It also made me doubt even Ron Paul&#8230;BTW We cannot return to a GOLD/SILVER standard it just will not work&#8230;Web of Debt by Ellen Brown, Vile Acts of Evil by Mike Kirchubel and No More National Debt by Bill Still point this out, we cannot return to a gold standard.  PS  READ REVELATION IN THE BIBLE&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlw895</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980023</link>
		<dc:creator>rlw895</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point!  You are a virtuous person.  The nation did not rise up against Bush/Cheney when they used the excuse of the &quot;war on terror&quot; to grab a huge amount of power from congress and the people.  I would have thought one of Obama&#039;s first orders of business would have been to reverse that, and he did a little, but not nearly enough to make him free of your criticism.  My guess is a bit more charitable to Obama.  He probably wanted to reverse all that (notably what&#039;s in the &quot;Patriot Act,&quot; but also power the executive simply took), but found a fearful and at least disinterested public, and political oppontent who were ready to brand him as weak if he gave back any power.  Not that his opponents disagreed, but they vowed to make him a one-term president by any means necessary.  So Obama did the rational thing anyone would do who wanted to get reelected--go with the low-risk status quo.  I was hopeful that would change after the election, but Obama does not seem willing to spend any political capital on reversing course.  This issue is the biggest knock on Obama, and unless he makes corrections, will be a blemish on his legacy.  The answer right now is for the public to start to care.  If we don&#039;t reverse, to a large measure, the 9/11 terrorists won; our unvirtuous reaction has done more damage than terrorist attacks would likely every cost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point!  You are a virtuous person.  The nation did not rise up against Bush/Cheney when they used the excuse of the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; to grab a huge amount of power from congress and the people.  I would have thought one of Obama&#8217;s first orders of business would have been to reverse that, and he did a little, but not nearly enough to make him free of your criticism.  My guess is a bit more charitable to Obama.  He probably wanted to reverse all that (notably what&#8217;s in the &#8220;Patriot Act,&#8221; but also power the executive simply took), but found a fearful and at least disinterested public, and political oppontent who were ready to brand him as weak if he gave back any power.  Not that his opponents disagreed, but they vowed to make him a one-term president by any means necessary.  So Obama did the rational thing anyone would do who wanted to get reelected&#8211;go with the low-risk status quo.  I was hopeful that would change after the election, but Obama does not seem willing to spend any political capital on reversing course.  This issue is the biggest knock on Obama, and unless he makes corrections, will be a blemish on his legacy.  The answer right now is for the public to start to care.  If we don&#8217;t reverse, to a large measure, the 9/11 terrorists won; our unvirtuous reaction has done more damage than terrorist attacks would likely every cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ?Forward to this Book by.....</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980012</link>
		<dc:creator>?Forward to this Book by.....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard Dean....Google...Karl Rove, Howard Dean joke and debate foreign, domestic policy dukechronicle.com....Quote...In the evening before the final presidential debate, Karl Rove—political analyst and former senior advisor to former President George W. Bush—debated Howard Dean—former governor of Vermont and former Democratic National Committee Chairman—on the effects of the 2012 Presidential Election on America’s role in global politics in a fully packed Page Auditorium.......

Rove had originally been slated to debate Robert Gibbs, President Barack Obama’s campaign advisor and former White House Press Secretary, but because Gibbs was unable to attend, Dean replaced him...........

Moderating the debate was political science professor Peter Feaver, director of the American Grand Strategy program, which sponsored the event. Feaver joked that, had they not gotten Dean to fill in last minute, he would have had to “pull a Clint Eastwood” and have Rove debate an empty chair........

Unlike the night’s more pugnacious presidential debate, Rove and Dean’s camaraderie and banter caused their debate to resemble a conversation between friends with opposing political viewpoints. When Feaver asked Rove and Dean to introduce each other, for example, both debaters plied one another with backhanded compliments...........

During Rove’s introduction, he poked fun about various moments throughout Dean’s political career. Rove described how Dean supported Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater in 1964 “and then went downhill from there.” He also joked about a later Democratic Convention in which Dean “drank with Kennedy people but voted with the Carter people.”..........

Despite these comments, Rove sincerely commended Dean for being a “fervent advocate for the things he believes in” and for his long service as governor of Vermont...........Michael...Michael...Michael...They (the Illuminati) attack us from SO MANY angles.  Howard Dean is EVIL also. The point to going Socialist/Progressive is CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL, no better than the Corrupted Captitalist Banker Establishment.  We are attached from the top &quot;Rich&quot; Corporate Class and from the Bottom by the Socialist/Dem class that wants a totally dependent Welfare state. I still think your book is good in how it criticizes the Federal Reserve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Dean&#8230;.Google&#8230;Karl Rove, Howard Dean joke and debate foreign, domestic policy dukechronicle.com&#8230;.Quote&#8230;In the evening before the final presidential debate, Karl Rove—political analyst and former senior advisor to former President George W. Bush—debated Howard Dean—former governor of Vermont and former Democratic National Committee Chairman—on the effects of the 2012 Presidential Election on America’s role in global politics in a fully packed Page Auditorium&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Rove had originally been slated to debate Robert Gibbs, President Barack Obama’s campaign advisor and former White House Press Secretary, but because Gibbs was unable to attend, Dean replaced him&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Moderating the debate was political science professor Peter Feaver, director of the American Grand Strategy program, which sponsored the event. Feaver joked that, had they not gotten Dean to fill in last minute, he would have had to “pull a Clint Eastwood” and have Rove debate an empty chair&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Unlike the night’s more pugnacious presidential debate, Rove and Dean’s camaraderie and banter caused their debate to resemble a conversation between friends with opposing political viewpoints. When Feaver asked Rove and Dean to introduce each other, for example, both debaters plied one another with backhanded compliments&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>During Rove’s introduction, he poked fun about various moments throughout Dean’s political career. Rove described how Dean supported Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater in 1964 “and then went downhill from there.” He also joked about a later Democratic Convention in which Dean “drank with Kennedy people but voted with the Carter people.”&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Despite these comments, Rove sincerely commended Dean for being a “fervent advocate for the things he believes in” and for his long service as governor of Vermont&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Michael&#8230;Michael&#8230;Michael&#8230;They (the Illuminati) attack us from SO MANY angles.  Howard Dean is EVIL also. The point to going Socialist/Progressive is CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL, no better than the Corrupted Captitalist Banker Establishment.  We are attached from the top &#8220;Rich&#8221; Corporate Class and from the Bottom by the Socialist/Dem class that wants a totally dependent Welfare state. I still think your book is good in how it criticizes the Federal Reserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chalk</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-980003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-980003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MK:  In your original POST here, you accused Fox of pushing the theory that Obama was behind the massacre.  Not a guest on Fox.  Then you waffled.  Then you implied Fox agreed with the guest&#039;s point of view.  Now you say Fox is pretending to diasagree with the guest, while secretly hoping a gullible public will believe it.  I believe you have a future at MSNBC.  That&#039;s what I believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK:  In your original POST here, you accused Fox of pushing the theory that Obama was behind the massacre.  Not a guest on Fox.  Then you waffled.  Then you implied Fox agreed with the guest&#8217;s point of view.  Now you say Fox is pretending to diasagree with the guest, while secretly hoping a gullible public will believe it.  I believe you have a future at MSNBC.  That&#8217;s what I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kirchubel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979953</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kirchubel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Sunday,1/20/13, Googling: obama staged sandy hook fox news, now has 35 million links.  try it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Sunday,1/20/13, Googling: obama staged sandy hook fox news, now has 35 million links.  try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kirchubel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979949</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kirchubel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying, again to post this.  I knew you would like that particulat link.  I had an off-line conversation about that one with another person who contacted me via my email.  The point was that Fox can push their agenda of providing anti-Obama propaganda even while saying they don&#039;t agree with this guys flaky theory.  By presenting this theory and then saying they don&#039;t agree with it, they are still preneting it to ten million new viewers who would not have heard of it in the first place.  Please read George Lakoff&#039;s &quot;Don&#039;t think of an elephant&quot;  for more background.  By the way, that&#039;s why I said &quot;Fox guests,&quot; and not &quot;Fox.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying, again to post this.  I knew you would like that particulat link.  I had an off-line conversation about that one with another person who contacted me via my email.  The point was that Fox can push their agenda of providing anti-Obama propaganda even while saying they don&#8217;t agree with this guys flaky theory.  By presenting this theory and then saying they don&#8217;t agree with it, they are still preneting it to ten million new viewers who would not have heard of it in the first place.  Please read George Lakoff&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t think of an elephant&#8221;  for more background.  By the way, that&#8217;s why I said &#8220;Fox guests,&#8221; and not &#8220;Fox.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Kirchubel</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979927</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Kirchubel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew you would like that one in particular.  That&#039;s why I said &quot;Fox guests.&quot; I mentioned this video off-line to another person who contacted me directly using my email and the point I made, which I&#039;m sure would be lost on you, was that Fox, by presenting this theory, even if they said they disagreed with it, still is presenting it to ten million new viewers.  George Lakoff&#039;s Book, &quot;Don&#039;t think of a elephant&quot; presents this tactic very well. If I told you NOT to think of an elephant, what are you thinking about?  An elephant.  If Fox hadn&#039;t mentioned this guy&#039;s idiotic theory in the first place, there would be ten million fewer people thinking about it.  They can push their core propaganda of bashing Obama, even while saying they don&#039;t agree with the idiot, because ten million more people are thinking about this theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew you would like that one in particular.  That&#8217;s why I said &#8220;Fox guests.&#8221; I mentioned this video off-line to another person who contacted me directly using my email and the point I made, which I&#8217;m sure would be lost on you, was that Fox, by presenting this theory, even if they said they disagreed with it, still is presenting it to ten million new viewers.  George Lakoff&#8217;s Book, &#8220;Don&#8217;t think of a elephant&#8221; presents this tactic very well. If I told you NOT to think of an elephant, what are you thinking about?  An elephant.  If Fox hadn&#8217;t mentioned this guy&#8217;s idiotic theory in the first place, there would be ten million fewer people thinking about it.  They can push their core propaganda of bashing Obama, even while saying they don&#8217;t agree with the idiot, because ten million more people are thinking about this theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Chalk....If you have the TIME</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979381</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Chalk....If you have the TIME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 05:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please feel free to tick off your answers to my &quot;Dating Game&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please feel free to tick off your answers to my &#8220;Dating Game&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chalk</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MRC:  I will once again try to post my strong agreement with your analysis if how Mr. Kirchubel operates on these web pages (and in his editorial column).  I tried a few days ago to do this, but for some reason my post evaporated into the ether.  The Fox/school massacre/Obama collusion accusation by MK is just the latest example of his spin, and outright falsification of the facts, when necessary to paint his twisted view of the way Fox and any other conservative voice presents their case.  I had pretty much decided to avoid this toxic website from now on, but seeing your latest post made me break my resolve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRC:  I will once again try to post my strong agreement with your analysis if how Mr. Kirchubel operates on these web pages (and in his editorial column).  I tried a few days ago to do this, but for some reason my post evaporated into the ether.  The Fox/school massacre/Obama collusion accusation by MK is just the latest example of his spin, and outright falsification of the facts, when necessary to paint his twisted view of the way Fox and any other conservative voice presents their case.  I had pretty much decided to avoid this toxic website from now on, but seeing your latest post made me break my resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE SHOOTINGS ARE PSYOPS</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979338</link>
		<dc:creator>THE SHOOTINGS ARE PSYOPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But then so was the Oklahoma Federal Buidling - Clinton Administration, 911 Was an inside job - Bush Administration.  If Mitt Romney had been elected we would probably still have had the same staged Psyops shootings, only then the Tea Party Ect...might have laid down better for the gun control because it would have been a Republican Administration.  The Republicans in the House and Senate had better stand up against Daine Feinstein and any Executive Order from President Obama....in a way I hope he does issue Exectutive Oders, we could use this as grounds for Impeachment...sadly then Hello President Biden.  REMEMBER REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT BOTH PARTIES ARE OWNED AT THE TOP BY THE ILLUMINATI INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SO PARTY ON DUDES AND DUDETTS, Go back to sleep, everything will be all right your choosen &quot;Party&quot; will save you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then so was the Oklahoma Federal Buidling &#8211; Clinton Administration, 911 Was an inside job &#8211; Bush Administration.  If Mitt Romney had been elected we would probably still have had the same staged Psyops shootings, only then the Tea Party Ect&#8230;might have laid down better for the gun control because it would have been a Republican Administration.  The Republicans in the House and Senate had better stand up against Daine Feinstein and any Executive Order from President Obama&#8230;.in a way I hope he does issue Exectutive Oders, we could use this as grounds for Impeachment&#8230;sadly then Hello President Biden.  REMEMBER REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT BOTH PARTIES ARE OWNED AT THE TOP BY THE ILLUMINATI INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SO PARTY ON DUDES AND DUDETTS, Go back to sleep, everything will be all right your choosen &#8220;Party&#8221; will save you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRC</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979323</link>
		<dc:creator>MRC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 03:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link Mike.  I will repost it (video.foxnews.com/v/2093892454001/sandy-hook-conspiracy-theory-tests-limits-of-free-speech) so that anyone that is not too drunk on your kool-aid can watch for themselves and see just how you create the spin for your column.  Your column insinuates that Fox News somehow buys into a guest “ promoting the idea that the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre was “staged” by President Obama to make guns look bad in order to promote gun control laws”.  The clip is actually about how Fox News feels that the nut job professor in question should be fired for his comments.  Your column use to make me feel the need to respond to your rants but now that it is obvious that what you write has little to do with fact and more just Mike’s own little world, there is no need to waste my time.  The only argument that you have for those that disagree with you is to intentionally misrepresent their position.  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  You are pathetic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Mike.  I will repost it (video.foxnews.com/v/2093892454001/sandy-hook-conspiracy-theory-tests-limits-of-free-speech) so that anyone that is not too drunk on your kool-aid can watch for themselves and see just how you create the spin for your column.  Your column insinuates that Fox News somehow buys into a guest “ promoting the idea that the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre was “staged” by President Obama to make guns look bad in order to promote gun control laws”.  The clip is actually about how Fox News feels that the nut job professor in question should be fired for his comments.  Your column use to make me feel the need to respond to your rants but now that it is obvious that what you write has little to do with fact and more just Mike’s own little world, there is no need to waste my time.  The only argument that you have for those that disagree with you is to intentionally misrepresent their position.  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.  You are pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTW....Google</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979298</link>
		<dc:creator>BTW....Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operation Mockingbird horrors]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operation Mockingbird horrors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fire and Rain</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979295</link>
		<dc:creator>Fire and Rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSqT_PeiV0U]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/wSqT_PeiV0U?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rise w/the Tide Go w/the Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979285</link>
		<dc:creator>Rise w/the Tide Go w/the Flow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGfvg4SH_4M]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/kGfvg4SH_4M?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A swing version</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979260</link>
		<dc:creator>A swing version</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=541HKD8alfg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/541HKD8alfg?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I think all these guys are "Fishy"</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979258</link>
		<dc:creator>I think all these guys are "Fishy"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK_wrM8OdGY]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/iK_wrM8OdGY?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HA!</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979078</link>
		<dc:creator>HA!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet you thought I would put &quot;Hide the Pickle&quot; on this list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you thought I would put &#8220;Hide the Pickle&#8221; on this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Institutionalized Tyranny</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979075</link>
		<dc:creator>Institutionalized Tyranny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[he institutionalization of tyranny is the achievement of the Bush/Obama regimes of the 21st century. This, and not the Great Society, is the decisive break from the American tradition. The Bush Republicans demolished almost all of the constitutional protections of liberty erected by the Founding Fathers. The Obama Democrats codified Bush’s dismantling of the Constitution and removed the protection afforded to citizens from being murdered by the government without due process. One decade was time enough for two presidents to make Americans the least free people of any developed country, indeed, perhaps of any country. In what other country or countries does the chief executive officer have the right to murder citizens without due process?wwwinfowars....see...The Institutionalization of Tyranny Paul Craig Roberts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he institutionalization of tyranny is the achievement of the Bush/Obama regimes of the 21st century. This, and not the Great Society, is the decisive break from the American tradition. The Bush Republicans demolished almost all of the constitutional protections of liberty erected by the Founding Fathers. The Obama Democrats codified Bush’s dismantling of the Constitution and removed the protection afforded to citizens from being murdered by the government without due process. One decade was time enough for two presidents to make Americans the least free people of any developed country, indeed, perhaps of any country. In what other country or countries does the chief executive officer have the right to murder citizens without due process?wwwinfowars&#8230;.see&#8230;The Institutionalization of Tyranny Paul Craig Roberts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StR</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-979065</link>
		<dc:creator>StR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-979065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wwwprisonplanet.tv.....Video Archives
The Alex Jones Show - January 18, 2013...Check this out....WAKE UP PEOPLE....Talking about Sandy Hook and Gun confiscation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wwwprisonplanet.tv&#8230;..Video Archives<br />
The Alex Jones Show &#8211; January 18, 2013&#8230;Check this out&#8230;.WAKE UP PEOPLE&#8230;.Talking about Sandy Hook and Gun confiscation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StR --- New Game!</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-978797</link>
		<dc:creator>StR --- New Game!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-978797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONTESTANTS -- G-Man, Mr. Practical and Mr. Brooks....Seventh Question....Which game do you most like to play? (Pick One)....Backgammon....Bridge....Chess.... Golf....Pinochle....Poker....Tennis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CONTESTANTS &#8212; G-Man, Mr. Practical and Mr. Brooks&#8230;.Seventh Question&#8230;.Which game do you most like to play? (Pick One)&#8230;.Backgammon&#8230;.Bridge&#8230;.Chess&#8230;. Golf&#8230;.Pinochle&#8230;.Poker&#8230;.Tennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please do not be angry w/me</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-978449</link>
		<dc:creator>Please do not be angry w/me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyrepublic.com/?p=336050#comment-978449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember I am just some poor Nut w/a weird sense of humor.  OK So....CONTESTANTS -- G-Man, Mr. Practical and Mr. Brooks....Sixth Question.....Rank these in the order that you like best....1 being like it the best on down to least liked...OK?.....Crab Legs...Langostinos...Lobster...Oysters...Prawns...Scallops...StR....wants to know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember I am just some poor Nut w/a weird sense of humor.  OK So&#8230;.CONTESTANTS &#8212; G-Man, Mr. Practical and Mr. Brooks&#8230;.Sixth Question&#8230;..Rank these in the order that you like best&#8230;.1 being like it the best on down to least liked&#8230;OK?&#8230;..Crab Legs&#8230;Langostinos&#8230;Lobster&#8230;Oysters&#8230;Prawns&#8230;Scallops&#8230;StR&#8230;.wants to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dailyrepublic.com/opinion/localopinioncolumnists/review-of-fox-news-2012-continues/feed/ ) in 0.33174 seconds, on Jun 18th, 2013 at 8:05 pm PDT. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Jun 18th, 2013 at 9:05 pm PDT -->