Many voters in the city of Fairfield recently received a so-called “information only” flier stating that the only option they have to maintain services will be for the community to vote for a 1 percent sales tax that will generate almost twice the amount of money needed to sustain services.
The city had several other options that were brought forward but were quickly shelved, including:
These and many more ideas were quickly extinguished in an effort to preserve jobs and salaries and raise taxes.
Why did the city choose to have a 1 percent sales tax increase when a 0.5 percent tax would have gotten the job done and would have made the management be more frugal with our tax dollars instead of handing out retirement handshakes to retire with ridiculous 30 percent-plus increases in retirement with only one or two years of service in their new position?
Perhaps a no vote on an excessive 1 percent sales tax will send the message to our decision makers to not be so greedy asking more than they need, spend down some of their surplus, evaluate more options, and consider a 0.5 percent tax next year.