Comments on: We need dialogue on Second Amendment

By: P.S.

P.S. — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:26:02 +0000

The revolt was also caused by the removal of colonial script, the money supply by the English Government. This was also a major cause of the revolt. Read Web of Debt by Ellen Brown and Vile Acts of Evil by Mike Kirchubel to find out about this. And everyone be sure to BARF on the Federal Reserve.

By: StR

StR — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:23:14 +0000

@ Sick of It…..Very good. I agree.

By: Sick of it

Sick of it — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:18:12 +0000

The founding fathers knew that England tried to disarm the colonists which brought the revolt. The militia back then was the everyday farmers/citizens that had arms. The founders feared that the government could get corrupt as history has shown and harm the people with their power. The right to bear arms was part of a check and balance for the people. Putting in the word Militia kept the government from ever banning one. It allowed the right of the citizens to form a Militia. It also allowed arms!
Remember that even today, governments harm their people with their power throughout the world.

By: laffsatliers

laffsatliers — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:16:02 +0000

Mr. Kreinberg displays a profound lack of knowledge in this letter. The “militia” IS NOT the “U.S. armed forces.” Mr. K. then departs from civil discourse by naming opponents of the gun grabbers (see, nasty speech can work both ways) “gun nuts or paranoid survivalist groups.” Mr. K, I recommend you learn your history before spouting off with your “funny little letter.” The “militia” is and always has been every able bodied male citizen and not the National Guard or any other government controlled group.

By: Former FF resident

Former FF resident — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:04:27 +0000

What more dialogue could you want given the amount of regulation, which you claim to feel is needed, could we possibly have?

To clarify a point, I’m not proposing banning pistols and rifles, merely that they need to be regulated