Comments on: Deficit spending and spenders anonymous

By: laffsatliers

laffsatliers — Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:07:19 +0000

You still don’t get it, Danny. And the last sentence of my previous post still applies.

By: Danny Buntin

Danny Buntin — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:03:29 +0000

You should also know that it all depends on the context of the writings. But that would require reading and analyzing the grey areas, something you fake conservatives obviously can’t do.

By: laffsatliers

laffsatliers — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:30:50 +0000

Dear Danny: In an attempt to be nasty and funny at the same time and not knowing what British colloquialisms mean, you gave Marci a compliment by saying her essay is a load of …. (something the liberals don’t have) … Silly man, you.

By: Danny Buntin

Danny Buntin — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:23:25 +0000

Marci is nothing but a “Johnny come lately”, when it comes to spending concerns. She writes an editorial, because she can’t handle the heat in the kitchen(forums)anymore. Her partisan piece, not once mentioning the wars and Wall St heist. Basically she is saying that the poor people are bringing the country down. What a load of bollocks. The only thing Margaret Thatcher did, was help speed up the separation between the rich and the not-rich.

By: G-Man

G-Man — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:21:46 +0000

It’s like living in a ticking time bomb..the only true measure of a country’s fiscal health is it’s debt as measured as a percentage of it’s GDP..in 2000 that was about 35%…in 2008..48%….Today?whoops between 73-78%…we would have eventually have gotten there w/McCain too just slower…So live it up low information voters…as always you’ll be the first to be ground into dust…