Letters to editor

Arguments for water-rate increase are ridiculous

By From page A8 | February 23, 2014

I am writing with regard to the Vallejo/Green Valley water controversy in which the city of Vallejo continues to shirk its responsibility to reasonably maintain the Lakes Water System and is attempting to force a small group of nonresident customers to foot the bill for repairing decades of neglect.

Vallejo City Attorney Claudia Quintana made some disturbing comments that imply that because some Lakes Water System customers have homes with higher-than-average property values, it is reasonable for Vallejo to expect them to pay exorbitant prices for a basic service like water delivery. Quintana’s focus on home values is also surprising, because she is an attorney and should know that this data point is irrelevant to the merits of the lawsuit.

Should all residents of Vallejo pay more for essential services like water if their home is valued above the mean within the city limits? What about retirees? Or veterans? Or neighbors who bought their homes decades ago and could never afford to buy them at today’s prices? Let’s ask a basic question, “Since when is water means-tested?”

Wouldn’t any water customer push for a fair resolution when faced with water bills that are likely to balloon to $7,000 per year if the status quo is allowed to move forward?

Ms. Quintana would do well to advise Vallejo’s decision-makers to resolve this matter fairly instead of trying to distract the public’s attention with PR spin that is irrelevant to the matter at hand.

Mandy Mulgrew


Letter to the Editor


Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • TylerFebruary 23, 2014 - 11:46 am

    I don't see much difference between you overtly paying more vs you paying more in order to subsidize low income users. You do know subsidies will come along with the inevitable drought-induced rate increases we're all going to be hit with, don't you? I also think that if you choose to live in semi-rural, higher priced areas good for you. But it will cost more - more for fire protection, more for water, sometimes more for broadband. You can always move back into a congested city and see your expenses come down a bit. Please don't ask us rats to subsidize you and your chosen lifestyle.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.