FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA

Vacaville

Vaca council OKs movement to establish vehicle, facility funds

By From page A10 | February 26, 2014

VACAVILLE — The city council unanimously agreed that it was time to bring forward a policy to establish the need and purpose for a city vehicle and equipment replacement fund and establish a Capital Improvement Program for city facilities.

“This is not rocket science,” said Councilman Curtis Hunt. “It’s best practice.”

The city curbed or eliminated spending on both during the economic downturn replacing vehicles and equipment only when needed and setting aside just $70,000 out of the general fund for basic facilities maintenance.

During her presentation, Laura Kuhn, Vacaville’s city manager, said that with no capital improvement plan for major facility problems, such as replacing a generator, the money must come from reserves.

With the passage of two ballot measures and some one-time funds, the city has replenished its reserve with a projected increase in years to come, Kuhn said.  With the positive reserve flow and upcoming budget preparations looming, city staff is looking for direction in re-establishing the funding mechanisms.

“Decisions need to be made about key cost issues,” she said.

While council members agreed with the need, some also had concerns and suggestions such as capping the funds if not using the money to avoid a “slush fund” situation and also looking at the mileage on vehicles and culling those not being fully utilized.

Councilman Ron Rowlett also urged care in filling the funds.

“I don’t want to do it all today,” he said.

Reach Susan Winlow at 427-6955 or [email protected] Follow her on Twitter at www.twitter.com/swinlowdr.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Tax payerFebruary 26, 2014 - 5:27 am

    Mr. Rowlett: I don't want to do it all today. What does that mean? If our police officer is in a 140,000 emergency vehicle does that come before a fire apparatus that is rarely used? Police are so far behind on the maintenance that it makes it a real "emergency" to address them first versus dealing with the lawsuits you will get if there equipment fails during a pursuit. Put them in the proper order please. 6 years of minimal maintenance puts them on top!

    Reply | Report abusive comment

Special Publications »

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.