Lake Berryessa, seen from the top of the Monticello Dam. There are currently 9 water bonds in the state Legislature vying to replace the existing one. (Robinson Kuntz/Daily Republic file)

Solano County

Number of state water bond proposals increases

By From page A1 | March 07, 2014

FAIRFIELD — It’s suddenly the season for proposed multibillion-dollar state water bonds. Whatever emerges will hit home in Solano County.

An $11.1 billion bond measure crafted by the state Legislature in 2009 is scheduled to be on the November ballot. At least nine bills have been introduced in the Legislature in recent months to replace it. Only one water bond measure can be on the ballot.

Solano County leaders are watching. Any water bond passed by voters could play a key role in how Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water is delivered to local cities. It could play a key role in state efforts to reshape the Delta, including doing habitat restoration in eastern Solano County.

State Sen. Lois Wolk, D-Davis, has been crafting her Senate Bill 848 in the public arena since August 2013. She’s called the present $11.1 billion bond measure too expensive and like a Christmas tree with its various earmarked projects throughout the state.

Wolk’s proposed bond initiative is for $6.8 billion, including $900 million for safe drinking water, $2 billion for enhancing water supplies and water supply reliability, $1.2 billion for the Delta, $1.7 billion for improving watershed and ecosystems and $1 billion for water storage.

But, Wolk said earlier this week, it has no money in it for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan.

The Bay Delta Conservation Plan favored by the Brown administration would build twin tunnels to take water for 35 miles underneath the Delta for export to Southern California cities and Central Valley farms. The existing export system has seen operations curtailed at times to avoid killing the Delta smelt. Building the tunnels would require Delta habitat restoration to meet Endangered Species Act requirements.

Opponents say the Bay Delta Conservation Plan would hurt the Delta.

“In my view, a bond that includes anything that has to do with tunnels or the BDCP, a bond that becomes a referendum on that project, will fail,” Wolk said.

Wolk said that her bond proposal has been available to the public for months so people could look at it and give opinions.

“That was done deliberately,” Wolk said. “It was put together with the cooperation of the Delta counties and many others.”

Gov. Jerry Brown will have a large voice in what type of water bond is on the November ballot. Wolk said that, as of a week ago, Brown had yet let his views on a water bond be known.

The Solano County Board of Supervisors in April 2013 voted to support Wolk’s efforts, even before Wolk put a price tag on the bond and her bill took its latest shape. Supervisor Skip Thomson, whose 5th District includes part of the Delta, on Thursday said he continues to focus on this particular bill.

He told Wolk that the Delta counties will not support any bill giving money to the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, Thomson said. Wolk’s bill achieves that as best as it can, he said.

Also, it has the Delta Conservancy distribute money for Delta projects. Thomson called the conservancy “balanced,” with representation on it from Solano County and other Delta counties.

Finally, Thomson said, the county could compete for bond money to help build new North Bay Aqueduct pumps in the Sacramento River. That would take the pumps away from Barker Slough in eastern Solano County, where water quality can be poor and rare fish can live.

Wolk’s bill has moved through three Senate committees.

Still, Wolk’s bill has opposition, including from the Association of California Water Agencies, California Chamber of Commerce, Westland Water District that serves Central Valley farmers, and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Association of California Water Agencies wants Wolk’s bill amended to have more money for water storage and Delta sustainability.

Wolk’s bill has competition.

Also in the public eye for some time is Assembly Bill 1331 by Assemblyman Anthony Rendon, D-Lakewood. It calls for an $8 billion bond, including $1 billion for safe and clean drinking water, $1.5 billion for ecosystem and water projects and $2.5 billion for water storage capacity.

A bill passed in the Assembly and a bill passed in the Senate would at some point have to be reconciled. Wolk said that her bill and Rendon’s bill have a lot in common.

David Okita, general manager of the Solano County Water Agency, said his agency supports Wolk’s bill. Wolk’s bill and Rendon’s bill are the frontrunners because they’ve been in existence for so long, he said. But no one knows which of the many competing bills will end up going to the governor’s office, he said.

“You have to be fast on your feet, look at those bonds, see which ones are moving and see whatever we’re interested in is included in which bonds are moving,” he said.

Other bills to create a water bond measure for the November ballot are:

  • Assembly Bill 2686 by Assemblyman Henry Perea, D-Fresno. It calls for a $9.2 billion bond, including $1 billion for water quality and safe drinking water projects, $1.5 billion for ecosystem and watershed projects, $2.25 billion for the Delta and $3 billion for water storage projects.
  • Senate Bill 1370 by Sen. Cathleen Galgiani, D-Stockon. It calls for a $5.1 billion bond for water storage projects such as a new Sites reservoir in Colusa County.
  • Assembly Bill 1445 by Assemblyman Dan Logue, R-Marysville. It calls for a $5.8 billion bond for water storage and water quality improvement projects.
  • Senate Bill 927 by Sen. Anthony Cannello, R-Ceres, and Andy Vidak, R-Hanford. It calls for a $9.2 billion bond for drought relief and water supply reliability. It removes from the existing $11.1 billion measure money for ecosystem and watershed projects.
  • Assembly Bill 2043 by Assemblyman Frank Begelow, R-O’Neals, and Connie Conway, R-Tulare. It calls for a $7.9 billion bond for safe drinking water and water supply reliability, including $395 million in drought relief and $3 billion for water storage.
  • Senate Bill 1250 by Sen. Ben Hueso, D-San Diego, and Senate Bill 1080 by Sen. Jean Fuller, R-Bakersfield. Both propose simply to reduce the $11.1 billion bond, but at this point contain no details.

Reach Barry Eberling at 427-6929 or [email protected] Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/beberlingdr.

Barry Eberling

Barry Eberling

Barry Eberling has been a reporter with the Daily Republic since 1987. He covers Solano County government, transportation, growth and the environment. He received his bachelors of art degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara and his masters degree in journalism from the University of California, Berkeley.

Discussion | 9 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • The MisterMarch 07, 2014 - 6:46 am

    Never let a good crisis go to waste.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • william s edwardsMarch 07, 2014 - 7:22 am

    Senator Lois Wolk has been working for the interests of everyone for a long time and should be the best bet for us, in my opinion, after studying her work!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Mr. PracticalMarch 07, 2014 - 5:15 pm

    Unfortunately, Wolk has been the worst legislator in California on issues that impact small business.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • patrickMarch 07, 2014 - 1:43 pm

    I hope every taxpayer realizes we have to repay these bills. my credit is about maxed out.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • thirsty in mid 70'sMarch 07, 2014 - 6:37 pm

    In the mid 1970's during the last so-called drought aka water shortage, everyone in the state was required to cut down drastically on water use. Most of us did. Then we find out that water we were saving was being shipped to So-Cal to be used to fill swimming pools and golf course water traps. Myself, I don't like being a political pawn any longer. Wake up people...........

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksMarch 07, 2014 - 6:53 pm

    thirsty in mid 70's, they washed their cars, watered their lawns and let the water run down the streets. We really should dam that canal.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Mr. PracticalMarch 07, 2014 - 7:06 pm

    Yep. Lack of storage is the problem.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rick WoodMarch 08, 2014 - 2:50 am

    I would say A problem, not THE problem. Reservoirs don't make it rain more.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Mr. PracticalMarch 08, 2014 - 6:07 am

    Rick, if we had adequate storage would we be having this conversation?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.