Solano County

Frazier: Bay Delta plan funding poses risk

By From page A3 | February 13, 2014

FAIRFIELD — Proposed funding for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan is risky, says state Assemblyman Jim Frazier, and he’s introduced legislation to require state lawmaker approval for any tunnel or water conveyance through the Delta region.

“There is a significant amount of uncertainty on how this project will be paid for,” Frazier, D-Oakley, said in a press release. “The risk to ratepayers and taxpayers, should proposed funding not materialize, is considerable.”

He said testimony Wednesday during a hearing of the Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review, which Frazier chairs, revealed significant concerns about the projected costs of the plan and the economic impacts this project will have on the Delta region and the state.

“This hearing validated the concerns that I have, therefore, I have introduced Assembly Bill 1671, which will require legislative approval prior to the construction of any tunnel or water conveyance system through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,” Frazier said. “The potential costs of this megaproject are so great that I believe there needs to be additional legislative oversight before the state commits to this obligation.”

The Assembly bill does not take a position on the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, he said, but allows the Legislature the opportunity to work with the administration to ensure an economically sound project. By requiring the Legislature’s involvement in this process, Frazier said, AB 1671 will also ensure that California residents have the opportunity to comment on the viability of the plan.

Reach Ryan McCarthy at 427-6935 or [email protected]

Ryan McCarthy


Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Rick WoodFebruary 13, 2014 - 7:52 am

    There is no way this project proceeds without a state-wide consensus. Or if it does proceed without that consensus, there is no way it is sustainable. Why is this so hard for the people driving the bulldozer to understand? The dead and injured bodies left in their wake are rising, grabbing their pitchforks, and following behind, just waiting for the 'dozer to run out of gas. This bill is wise, and fair. We may yet snatch victory for the state out of the jaws of a major setback (like we had in 1982).

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.