Vets should be wary of Concerned Veterans for America’s pitchforks, torches

By From page C4 | May 25, 2014

This month marks 20 years of writing Military Update.  I’ve used it three times to editorialize about news events including President Clinton’s sex scandal while commander in chief and President George W. Bush worrisome plan to invade Iraq a month before it happened.

This week I do so again to shed light on a disturbing new force that is confusing veterans and darkening attacks on the Department of Veterans Affairs during the current health appointments scandal.  I refer to a well-funded group called Concerned Veterans for America (CVA).

So far one major veterans’ organization, The American Legion, has called on VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign, following a CNN report that 40 veterans might have died awaiting VA health care in Phoenix where appointment dates perhaps were fudged to make wait times look shorter.

I can’t claim to have covered VA medical appointments and wait times with enough depth or regularity to know if there’s gross mismanagement and deceptive bookkeeping at some or many VA facilities.  That will be verified, or not, by independent audits and criminal investigations now underway.

Most veterans’ groups continue to support Shinseki.  They say they know him well enough to believe he’ll address any abuses uncovered and will work to protect more veterans from harm.  And we’ll see.

But in my 37 years covering veterans’ issues, I have never seen veteran issues used more cynically or politicized more thoroughly than during the past several years.  At times the intent seems to be to shake trust in government generally rather than to address veterans’ needs.

In the thick of this is Concerned Veterans for America, posing as a vet advocacy group and being rewarded for it.  CVA press releases usually are partisan attacks.  Its spokesman, Pete Hegseth, an Iraq war vet and Republican who ran for a U.S. Senate in 2012, is quoted often by major news outlets without mention of press reports associating CVA with the Koch brothers, libertarian billionaires who create public interest groups to oppose big government.  That’s fine.  That’s protected speech.  A CVA spokesman told me last year it won’t reveal donor information.

What should upset vets is the use of select facts about VA and its programs to reinforce fears rather than give reliable information.  Last week a CVA press release hit a new low in purporting to document “lies” Shinseki told in congressional testimony, dropping any veil of respect for a decorated, combat-disabled soldier with a long and stellar career.

It is no coincidence only Republicans, including Rep. Jeff Miller (Fla.) and Sen. Richard Burr (N.C.), participate in CVA events.  They should reconsider.  Though CVA sponsors an occasional informative forum in Washington D.C., it produces no careful analyses of what ails VA.  The goal seems to be to attack, relentlessly, while a Democrat holds the White House.

Traditional vet groups are alarmed by the rising profile CVA has on cable news programs and in newspapers where informed opinions on chronic claim backlogs and care delays should rule.  Instead, there’s heated rhetoric that stirs dissent and attempts to turns the public against a department the CVA routinely portrays always as too costly and too ineffective.

Joseph Violante, national legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, a well-informed and thoughtful advocate for vets over decades, recalls being invited to react to Hegseth’s critique of VA on a talk radio program in Wisconsin.  He was upset to hear Hegseth contend VA budgets continue to climb despite “four million fewer veterans” than a decade ago.

“I said, ‘Yea, there are probably four million fewer.  But they are not all in VA health care’ ” Violante said.  “If you look at health care numbers on unique patients, it hasn’t changed much the past decade [at almost six million being treated].  Enrollment has gone up to about nine million.

“But to throw stuff out like that shows they don’t understand what the hell they are talking about.  They mix the claims process with the healthcare process and the backlog and wait lists like they are one thing.  Every time I see [CVA on TV or in print] the hair on the back of my neck just stands up.”

Long-time advocates like Violante worry that CVA’s arguments, over time, will give politicians cover to cut VA funding severely or even to dismantle much of the VA health care system.

“They have these people out there saying, ‘We’re giving VA too much.  We’re giving the Defense Department too much.’  Their whole purpose is to
give support to anyone
who wants to cut government, particularly for veterans.”

The theme that VA is too costly and ineffective is critical to a message of doubt in government programs.  If the vast VA bureaucracy can’t satisfy your medical needs, isn’t it best to get care from the private sector?

DAV, American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars want the VA preserved for its expertise and resources in caring for vets.  They fear bills to supplement the VA care by sending vets into the private sector for care nearer to home is a first step toward watering down VA quality of care.

Shinseki concedes his controversial decisions to make ischemic heart disease, Parkinson’s disease and B-cell leukemia service-related conditions for anyone who stepped foot in Vietnam helped to create the tsunami of claims and health care obligations that has overwhelmed VA,
even as hundreds of thousands of vets came home from long, recent wars.

On his watch VA also simplified the process for filing post-traumatic stress disorder claims from veterans of all wars, made compensable more illnesses for 1990-91 Gulf War veterans exposed to in-theater toxins, and launched an aggressive outreach to explain to vets potential disabilities.  That’s why the typical claim today has a dozen compensable conditions to be reviewed versus three to four in past wars.

Congress must be aggressive in its oversight of VA health care delays and abuses.  But politicians also need to take a hard look at why VA claims and health care have been overwhelmed, and avoid the bitter sound bite wars that give a group like CVA an equal voice with truly pro-vet advocates.

Send comments to Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120, email [email protected] or tweet @Military_Update.


Discussion | 23 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • just sayin'May 25, 2014 - 8:32 am

    All this rot just to slam someone for being Republican. What a sham of an article.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rich GiddensMay 25, 2014 - 9:04 am

    Exactly-----CVA and IAVA speaks for me, not Tom Philpott and the Associated Press! It's not a crime to be a Vet and a Republican!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dave ShreeveMay 25, 2014 - 10:11 am

    We don't need more investigations to determine if there was wrong doing. We already know that there was. The only thing that needs to be investigated is how deep and far reaching the problem is. Philpott is showing his innate leftist, anything to cover Obama, bias.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • KenRMay 25, 2014 - 11:07 am

    He did nothing of the sort. He cited the problems but in essence, said there is this group that does nothing to help veterans, but will distort the facts to match repugnican and tea party rhetoric, that, in itself, may or may not be true. Or may or may not be of any real significance. This rhetoric on inflames a specific group, that would do nothing for The United States except that which the tea party or repugnicans contend we should do to make big oil richer and the middle class poorer. We only need the facts and we need change within the VA, which has done a great job, that needs improvement.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Carson Lla BelleMay 26, 2014 - 10:24 am

    A well written and researched article. General Shinseki should not resign. The problems with the VA were not created by one individual. They have developed over the past 30 plus years. Think maybe after every war this country has been involved in. When our government elects to send our military into a war that same day they should prepare for what happens after the war and beef up the VA medical capabilities. That should be as important as sending the troups with all of the supplies and equipment when they go over. Oh, that wasn't done either was it...Iraq, Rumsfelt?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksJune 06, 2014 - 7:00 am

    Carson, absolutely! This comes down to Reid and McConnell with their usual bickering. Back in February The GOP blocked a bill to help Veterans. They wanted to tie sanctions on Iraq to the bill and then debated the cost of support. They want to give massive tax breaks to the wealthy but reduce support for the VA. Rather than sign a bill that is long over-due, this is just another political mess.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rick WoodMay 26, 2014 - 11:10 am

    I guess the truth hurts, as some of these comments confirm. What, there is a "veterans' interest group" that wants to cut the VA? It's funded by the Koch brothers? It must also be a favorite on Fox. I mean, that's how this whole echo box thing works. How about we check with the VFW before we believe tainted groups like the CVA? Republicans want to CUT the VA. Is that true or not? The VA medical case load has skyrocketed because it's recognizing more service-related conditions. I say that's a GOOD THING. But we have to pay for it. What we need is a Marshall Plan for the VA. Democrats will be for it, Obama and Shinseki will definitely be for it. Unfortunately, that alone almost guarantees Republicans will be against it. I have no influence over that, but the Republicans in the room might. What say you?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Rick WoodMay 27, 2014 - 9:41 pm

    More silence. Sad.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • KathyJune 06, 2014 - 4:31 am

    This summation is so far off base that it is laughable! This is a partisan attack on the CVA group that is without reason and would prefer to inhibit free speech. Any criticism of the direction of our nation would rile the hornet who authored this propaganda piece. This one sentence sums up the entirety of this ridiculous article: "The goal seems to be to attack, relentlessly, while a Democrat holds the White House".

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James RileyJuly 16, 2014 - 7:43 pm

    anyone who supports VA Medical Services for Veterans is a supporter of communism. Veterans prefer a choice system that made America the most powerful country in the world. The current system, and their programs, supports soviet labor unions. We need to support a free choice system to eliminate spying and control. Specialized medical services is a lie. Robert Kennedy was seen on TV for yelling at Hoffa, accusing him of bringing communists into the Unions.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Bob CuddyJanuary 07, 2015 - 11:21 am

    Looks like someone just forgot to take their VA prescribed meds.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • blpadge2August 08, 2014 - 4:01 pm

    Just say a CVA ad attacking Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC) like she single-handedly had the power to clean up the VA and smelled a rat. Thanks for confirming the Koch connection.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • nydavidAugust 16, 2014 - 8:58 pm

    This is the reason why the IRS is investigating such organizations. CVA poses as a veteran's organization, but in reality, it is a political action committee. It puts itself out as such an organization so that it doesn't have to reveal its donors (different type of organization).

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • RobAugust 26, 2014 - 4:07 pm

    It is very clear that the majority of an individual and group media are intentionally liberal to a fault. The nasty ramifications of foul liberalism is far more dangerous then foul conservative media. Look in the mirror Mr. Philpott. Socialist will look for the weakest link in a Democracy and the Demorats welcomed them in to spread cancer through a satanic Obama.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Mike Leonard, CAPT, USN (Ret)August 29, 2014 - 6:58 pm

    The fascist scumbag Koch brothers seem to cook up another right wing PAC every other day. Now besides CVA they have Carolina Rising, lying about Pat McCrory and Thom Tillis trying to improve public education in NC, when they really want to destroy it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom OsborneSeptember 15, 2014 - 3:24 pm

    Thanks Tom,Jason Quick with CVA just had an article printed in the Minneapolis Star Tribune on 09/12/2014.I believe both sides of the isle can have positive ideas how best to support our Veterans but Mr.Quicks comments were so over-the-top Tea Party ranting that any credibility went away immediately.It would be wonderful to see who finances this organization because he certainly does not speak for this combat related disabled Vietnam veteran. Tom O.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Colonel (Ret) Hal Emick , USASeptember 24, 2014 - 5:08 pm

    Enough of the bull - CVA states the facts. Someone needs to stand up - they have. The VA needs To clean its act up. Hold them accountable. Go CVA.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • jrcurtis45September 27, 2014 - 5:20 am

    I am a Veteran and I support CVA! I am certain that you will find that most Veterans support CVA. You liberals take this too far, at times and this is one of them. If your mad because we don't support you liberal agenda then start your own Veteran's group. I doubt you would have many members, unless you built your membership the way Democrats create voters and resurrect the dead.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jerry SullivanNovember 12, 2014 - 8:31 pm

    The national VSOs have been "in bed" with the DVA forever. Even in the darkest days of the 60s and 70s the Legion, VFW, DAV and all severely resisted any effort to outsource VA healthcare or to reduce the VA healthcare system in favor of better, more available and less expensive care in the private healthcare system. They love their lofty perches and playing politics with congress! Even those of us who were/are hours from definitive care were disregarded until finally the stopgap CBOC system was introduced, but still, vets with serious needs still travel long distances to seek care in a cold, inefficient, poorly operated bureaucracy, often to be treated like SECOND RATE CITIZENS. My experiences as a PT rated combat wounded Vietnam veteran.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jerry SullivanNovember 12, 2014 - 8:40 pm

    Hey, you guys on the LEFT/RIGHT political rants.. YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM and play into the concept of divide and conquer!! The only justice for veterans and their needed healthcare is to give us a personal option.. IN or OUT of the VA system with the option to go to private providers paid by the government!!! The VHA is a poorly operated albatross and we suffer. We all do not live 20 minutes from a state of the art VA Hospital... hell, MANY of us would be better off on WELFARE!!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • BozoDecember 08, 2014 - 7:32 am

    Obviously the author of this article does not exist in the same country as the vets nor has he served in a combat role.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Pamela M.January 07, 2015 - 1:21 pm

    I totally support CVA!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jerry Sullivan U.S.A. Ret.January 07, 2015 - 3:19 pm

    We took the same heat when we started V.V.A. back in the 80s.. a great institutional resistance to badly needed change!!! V.A. healthcare is the biggest, most wasteful and shamefully executed socialistic program ever instituted in our history.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.