FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA
bates column sig

Local lifestyle columnists

Breakfast after the Bell wins support

By From page A2 | August 21, 2014

A new school year has started and that for principals, teachers and parents includes thinking about the importance of children eating breakfast. According to research, eating breakfast definitely links to higher student achievement.

Writing this column certainly brought back memories of growing up below poor (if there’s such a thing) in rural Tennessee. The memories remain as vivid today as if it all happened yesterday. Breakfast consisted of oatmeal or rice with sugar and butter every morning. Nevertheless, we still ate something before we headed off to school. On Sundays, our mother made hot biscuits and gravy. I never cared for biscuits and gravy and still don’t.

Today, many children still leave home for school without eating breakfast. Years ago, based on similar research, federally funded free or reduced breakfast and lunch programs (though not in my time) came to many schools around the country. Still I read recently that the school breakfast program only reaches about 18 percent of the children though 54 percent of California schoolchildren qualify for free or reduced food.

An extensive article about breakfast and learning recently ran in California Schools magazine. It covered a program called Breakfast after the Bell at Wilkerson Elementary School in El Monte. Wilkerson is among a growing number of schools that serve breakfast during the first 10 minutes of the regular school day. After the school day officially opens, time is set aside for children to eat breakfast.

With heavy schedules already, one obstacle meant winning over the teachers, classified staff and custodians, but the staff became more and more supportive as student engagement, achievement and lack of distracting interruptions, the report said. That picking up the breakfast carts from outside the classroom doors turned out easier than cleaning up the cafeteria came as a surprise.

Since there is only 10 minutes for the breakfast program, everything must run like clockwork. Sixth-graders arrive early, pick up breakfast carts from the cafeteria, and deliver the food directly to the classrooms. Teachers devised efficient procedures for passing out the food and cleanup. You might wonder what kinds of breakfast foods are served? The school boasts mango fruit, kiwis and Mexican sweet breads, as well as other things. Food surveys give children a voice in food satisfaction.

Breakfast after the Bell is a good option, researchers say, for districts with large numbers of children who are eligible for free and reduced meals. So important is the impact of children eating breakfast that it would be feasible to offer breakfast after the bell to all children even if they do not qualify for free or reduced meals, some say. Others maintain that eating a healthy breakfast has such an impact on learning that time out for breakfast should count as instructional time.

According to the Breakfast after the Bell report, schools that have implemented the program report higher test scores, less discipline problems, less tardiness and higher average daily attendance. Districts also receive more money, as districts receive federal reimbursements for every breakfast they serve.

The report went on to say that innovative school districts with alternative breakfast programs amassed amazing results on the teaching and learning at these schools. What about the traditional school breakfast program? The report maintained that there wasn’t enough participation in the traditional breakfast program.

In conclusion, Breakfast after the Bell research reported that a healthy breakfast links to higher student achievement in the following ways:

  • Students who eat breakfast on average get better grades.
  • Eating breakfast has been shown to improve a child’s cognitive and mental abilities.
  • Schools with higher participation rates in breakfast programs have, on average, higher Academic Performance Index scores than schools with lower breakfast program participation rates.
  • Schools with robust breakfast programs have lower absenteeism and, therefore, higher average daily attendance.

Unfortunately, children who do not attend schools with a breakfast program would not have the same access to this “nutrition learning boost.” Researchers also report that healthy breakfast eating habits decrease with age. Ninety-two percent of children ages 6 to 11 eat breakfast while only 77 percent of students from ages 12 to 19 eat breakfast.

Mayrene Bates is a trustee on the Solano County Board of Education. Reach her at [email protected]

Mayrene Bates

Mayrene Bates is a trustee with the Solano County Board of Education.
LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 5 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Linda WingardAugust 21, 2014 - 3:18 am

    My experience as an elementary school secretary was that if breakfast was extended into the school day children were often no longer brought to school early enough to have breakfast which was offered half an hour before class began and they missed valuable instruction time when teachers sent them to the cafeteria after class had started. And consistently it was the same students.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • truth'nAugust 21, 2014 - 7:12 am

    Parents need to take care of their own children or here's an idea .. not have kids .. until one is financially able to support a kid. We give people welfare, food stamps, section 8 and a wide amount of other tax payer provided services.. for gosh sakes, they can get their lazy rear ends up and fix breakfast themselves. If they can lay on their back and breed a baby, they can stand on their feet and earn the money to feed them.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JudyAugust 21, 2014 - 8:07 am

    To truth'n: You don't punish children for being born. If we can get them a decent breakfast we have helped a fellow human being. Maybe under different circumstances you would have gone hungry without a helping hand. Please don't be so quick to assume you know everyone's situation. To quote Bob Hope: If you haven't any charity in your heart, you have the worst kind of heart trouble.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tania GilliamAugust 21, 2014 - 11:26 am

    Thank you Judy. It's really sad to see how judgmental some people can be. There are many people who work 2 jobs and are still living in poverty therefore, qualifying for the free/reduced food program. I one hundred percent agree that it is not the fault of the children even if their parents are unwilling or unable to serve their children's basic needs. We should do everything we can to set each and every child up for success, not failure. If that means helping with meals then, so be it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • angry taxpayerAugust 21, 2014 - 3:14 pm

    It would be interesting to find out how many of these people that feel they need free breakfast at the taxpayers expense, have cable t.v., internet, video game systems, smartphones, or any number of luxuries that are not necessities. It would seem feeding your children would come before anything else. We've become a society with everyone with their hand out depending on the government to take care of them and their kids. Pathetic.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.