Nature park construction bids go before Fairfield council

By April 16, 2014

FAIRFIELD — A $2.7 million low bid for the Dunnell Nature Park off Hilborn Road should be awarded and a protest by a labor-management cooperative denied, the city staff recommends to City Council members who meet Tuesday.

The Northern Electrical Construction Industry Labor Management Cooperative Trust labor management trust based in Alameda County contends that low bidder D.L. Falk Construction in Hayward has had a history of labor violations on public works projects.

But Fred Beiner, manager of park planning for Fairfield, stated that various allegations by the labor management trust are minor, some of them apply to subcontractors rather than Falk and that Falk Construction contests at least one of the claims.

The city received seven bids ranging from Falk’s low bid of $2.7 million to a high bid of $3.5 million.

An attorney for Falk Construction wrote to Fairfield that the labor management group introduced no evidence to support its claims and that Falk Construction’s two decades of experience as a public works general contractor counter the assertions.

The labor management group describes itself as working to ensure fair bidding in public contracts and monitoring more than 1,000 public construction projects yearly.

The Dunnell family bequeathed the 7.8-acre property to the city for recreation and education. The project includes renovating the main residence at the site into a nature center and demolishing a second family residence because of seismic issues.

An Education Center is planned as part of the park construction. The center and grounds will be the site of the Life After School Program for Rolling Hills Elementary .

Construction authorization will be $3 million, which is the bid amount plus a 10 percent contingency, according to the city staff.

Council members meet at 6 p.m. in the council chamber at the Civic Center, 1000 Webster St. in Fairfield.

Reach Ryan McCarthy at 427-6935 or [email protected]

Ryan McCarthy


Discussion | 3 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • PaulApril 15, 2014 - 8:52 am

    2.7 million on a park when the roads are a disgrace! Have you seen the cobble stones in Fairfield? No parks could be a schools volunteer project with help from parents & grandparents. Who benefits should be the first question, financially? Let their names be know.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • SteveApril 15, 2014 - 8:28 pm

    Let's see. Who benefits from a public park? The public?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • PaulApril 16, 2014 - 8:16 am

    Having the word Public in Public Park does not mean the Public benefit when they are the ones paying for it. Since when did the unions call the shots? I thought we the People elected council members to serve us?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.