Large annexation gives Fairfield new growth frontier

By From page A1 | October 16, 2012

Canon Station Annexation

Cows wander through the fields by Vanden and Canon Road on Monday in Vacaville. Fairfield on Monday annexed 1,200 acres around this area, the largest annexation in 25 years. (Conner Jay/Daily Republic)

FAIRFIELD — Fairfield on Monday won approval to add a growth frontier of about two square miles to its boundaries, its largest single annexation since Rancho Solano a quarter-century ago.

The Solano Local Agency Formation Commission by a 3-0 vote passed the Canon Station annexation, covering 1,244 acres located near Travis Air Force Base. All that remains to wrap up the matter is for the state Board of Equalization and other agencies to finish the paperwork.

Development won’t begin immediately. Anthony Russo of  Canon Station LLC said that construction could start in 2015 or 2016, if the housing market recovers by then.

Among the next steps for Canon Station LLC is getting environmental permits from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other agencies, Russo said. The Army Corps of Engineers doesn’t want to work with a project proponent until the proposed development area is annexed, he said.

“We need to start negotiating with them sooner rather than later,” Russo told the LAFCO board. “As I’m sure you’re aware, these (negotiations) take time.”

Canon Station is one of two annexations envisioned for Fairfield’s planned train station community. The entire community is to have up to 6,800 homes, parks, a train station, businesses and industry.

Most of the Canon Station land is vacant, basically a blank slate awaiting the city’s development plans. It is to someday have 3,100 homes, a 300-acre industrial area, a 50-acre park and 25-acre lake.

Fairfield last week filed its proposed, 1,040-acre “core area” annexation request with LAFCO for a hearing next year. This second part of the train station community is to have 3,700 homes, shops, a school and the train station. Unlike the Canon Station annexation, this land has existing, rural businesses along Cement Hill, Peabody and Vanden roads.

City project consultant Ron Rowland told the LAFCO board what the proposed community will be like. The train station is key. About 3,000 dwellings are to be located within a half-mile radius of the station that is to be built at Peabody and Vanden roads.

“This is a transit-orientated development, a little denser than is typical in this part of Solano,” Rowland said.

The project will need $237 million in transportation improvements, Rowland said. These improvements include making Peabody Road six lanes south of Vanden Road to Air Base Parkway and four lanes north of Vanden Road to Vacaville, widening Vanden Road to four lanes and building New Canon Road to provide better access to the Travis Air Force Base north gate.

One point of contention arose at the LAFCO meeting. The Vacaville Fire Protection District provides fire service to the rural Canon Station area, but will hand off service to the Fairfield Fire Department once the annexation paperwork is complete.

The fire district stands to lose property tax money, $4,243 annually for the Canon Station annexation and an additional $30,329 for the proposed “core” annexation, for a total of a total of $34,572 annually.

“We cannot afford to lose any additional tax base and continue to provide the services to our residents and the public who travel through the (fire district) area,” district Chief Howard Wood wrote to LAFCO.

This issue goes beyond the Canon Station annexation. Local rural fire districts for years have said that they lose property tax money when cities annex land, even though their fixed expenses remain. They cannot benefit from rural development to get more revenue because Solano County has a policy that virtually all development should take place within the boundaries of a city.

The Vacaville Fire Protection District wanted Fairfield to pay for the annual lost tax money on a permanent basis. Fairfield offered to do so for 20 years, but not forever. The LAFCO board sided with the city.

“I think at some point things have to sunset,” LAFCO member and Dixon Mayor Jack Batchelor said.

LAFCO member John Saunderson asked why this issue hadn’t been settled before the Canon Station annexation request came to LAFCO. He said he didn’t favor moving forward with the annexation until the issue got worked out.

Batchelor said that Fairfield and the fire district had met and were at impasse, leaving LAFCO to decide the matter.

“I don’t want to have 20-years-versus-perpetuity holding up what I think is a valuable project,” Batchelor said.

Past Fairfield annexations of this size have often gotten enmeshed in local growth wars. Proposed growth near Travis Air Force Base in particular proved touchy during the 1990s. Some community members at that time expressed fear that building close to the base would make the base vulnerable to closure.

Such issues didn’t arise this time. The growth wars of the 1990s led Fairfield voters in 2002 to pass Measure L, which limits city growth near the base and other areas through 2020. Canon Station is within these growth boundaries.

LAFCO, which must approve all annexation, has members from the county, its cities and the public. Voting “yes” on Monday were Saunderson, Batchelor and Fairfield Mayor Harry Price.

Reach Barry Eberling at 427-6929, or [email protected] Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/beberlingdr.

Fairfield’s bigger annexation since 1980:

  • Highway 12 redevelopment area, 461 acres, 1980
  • Paradise Valley/Cement Ranch, 1,046 acres, 1985
  • Dunnel-Burton (Rolling Hills), 618 acres, 1985
  • Rancho Solano, 1,505 acres, 1985
  • Upper Mason, 293 acres, 1987
  • Green Vale, 287 acres, 1987
  • Serpas Ranch, 426 acres, 1992
  • Gold Ridge, 413 acres, 1994

Source: LAFCO

Correction: This version corrects references to the final vote.

Barry Eberling

Barry Eberling

Barry Eberling has been a reporter with the Daily Republic since 1987. He covers Solano County government, transportation, growth and the environment. He received his bachelors of art degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara and his masters degree in journalism from the University of California, Berkeley.

Discussion | 5 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • FairfielderOctober 16, 2012 - 3:33 am

    The sooner a supermarket moves into this area the better. I look forward to the new park too. Yay!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JagOctober 16, 2012 - 6:32 am

    I just hope the price of my house comes back up so I can sell it before TAFB packs up and moves and the housing market drops out again, Fairfield city council what a bunch of losers

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CD BrooksOctober 16, 2012 - 6:35 am

    1200 acres. Wow, I sure hope they don't find some protected species out there after the annexation, more useless property due to "critters." This is just more disgusting news. All that land out there is as it should be, unimproved. I cannot imagine the tranquil often windy fields littered with homes, terrible. That is right up there with the ridiculous notion of building the train station. The over pass is the only good solution anyone has presented and that should have been enough. Imagine a future of freeways buzzing along out there with off ramps into the neighborhoods. NICE! Whatever became of the shopping center at Clay Bank/ ABP?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Bankrupt Fairfield Seeks To Spend MoreOctober 16, 2012 - 8:44 am

    Growth next to Travis? Gee, wouldnt it great if Travis closed and it moved to Beale or McMinnville, Oregon? I suspect what will be built with this annexation of Felonfield's ''lieberstraum'' will be Agenda 21 packed and stacked apartment housing chock full of government's favorite animals. Didnt Fairfield get itself into fiscal trouble with previous annexations in Cordelia? Is history repeating itself again?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Local Developer's own our City Council.October 16, 2012 - 9:19 pm

    This is exactly why Sean Quinn should have NEVER been ANNOINTED Fairfield City Manager......I've been trying to tell everyone that this City Manager only cares about his inner circle of GREEDY developer buddies! Quinn wants to raise our Sales Tax..and if we don't give him what he wants he'll cut more of our city services...How can we provide more services to this train station development when we've been barely able to take care of our existing City? This City Council needs to fire Quinn and find someone that has actually ran a Municipality...The first responsibility that our Council has to it's Citizen's is providing services!....NOT DEVELOPMENT! Sean Quinn needs to go!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.