FAIRFIELD — Four career criminals from Solano County, all serving prison sentences of at least 25-years-to-life, are trying to get out of prison because of recent changes to California’s three-strikes laws.
Last year, California voters overwhelmingly agreed to change the state’s three-strikes law so that it only applied to criminals whose third felony offense was deemed serious or violent. The law had a provision to allow anyone in prison as a three-strikes offender to petition the courts to have their punishment reconsidered and possibly reversed by the courts.
Officials estimated as many as 3,000 three-strikes offenders statewide could have their sentences changed. The number of three-strikes offenders in Solano County has so far added up to only four inmates and prosecutors say that could be all of the petitions coming from inmates from Solano County as a result of the change in the law.
The petitions of three of those four three-strikes offenders were heard in court for the first time Friday. The fourth petition is set to be heard Jan. 28.
The low number of petitions is largely due to a policy of former District Attorney David Paulson to typically pursue a three-strikes punishment only when the third offense was deemed serious and violent.
The petitions come from four men, all former Vallejo residents. All have extensive criminal records.
Ronnie Winn, 59, is serving a 26-years-to-life sentence for beating and stomping a 60-year-old grandfather to death over a $3 debt.
Winn, a former professional boxer, attacked James Rendleman in 1999 over the debt incurred by Winn’s girlfriend. Winn grabbed Rendleman and lifted him off the ground by the throat. Rendleman responded to Winn’s action by picking up a 40-ounce King Cobra bottle and hitting Winn in the back of his head, according to witness testimony.
Winn responded by knocking Rendleman to the floor and unleashing a series of kicks and stomps to his head and body that left Rendleman severely injured. Rendleman, who suffered for a month before he died of the injuries, was beaten so severely Winn left a shoe print embedded in his face.
Judge E. Bradley Nelson transferred Winn’s petition to Judge Robert Bowers, who will decide Jan. 25 when to have Winn brought from prison for a hearing for his petition.
Deputy District Attorney Barry Taira said Friday that it was likely Winn’s crime would be considered serious and violent and that prosecutors would oppose any effort to change his 26-years-to-life sentence.
The second petition was filed Wednesday by Lewis “Lulu” Jenkins.
One morning in August 2000, Jenkins was walking with a prostitute when they happened upon a man passed out on a table in a Vallejo schoolyard. On the table next to the inebriate was a 40-ounce bottle of Olde English 800 and his semi-automatic pistol. Jenkins helped himself to the gun and to $22 in the man’s pocket.
Jenkins, a parolee at the time, dumped the gun but kept the cash. He was arrested a short time later.
The theft would have normally resulted in a maximum six-year prison stint, but because of Jenkins’ criminal record spanning more than 20 years, prosecutors went after Jenkins as a three-strikes offender. In 2001, Judge Mike Nail sentenced Jenkins to 25-years-to-life in prison.
Jenkins is scheduled to be taken from prison to appear in front of Nail at a hearing Jan. 31.
Also on Jan. 31, Nail will consider the petition of three-strikes offender Robert H. Grace.
In 1997, Grace, an ex-con, tried and failed to get away from Vallejo police in a car chase. He was found guilty of felony evading in 1998 and Nail sentenced him to 25-years-to-life in prison. Much of the court records and appellate records for Grace’s case have been purged.
In 2002, Anderson P. Thurston, now 53, was sentenced to 27-years-to-life in prison. His crimes were running a stop sign, driving the wrong way on a one-way road and speeding during a two-minute, slow-speed police chase. The offenses added up to a felony evading charge.
Judge Peter B. Foor imposed the sentence because of Thurston’s 13 prior felony convictions, and a lifetime of crime that started at 15 with a rape conviction. Thurston was on parole all of his adult life and had been out of prison for less than three weeks when he tried to flee from police.
“There has never been a time in his adult life when he has been off of parole,” Foor said.
Prosecutors had originally offered Thurston a four-year plea deal, but Thurston, who was acting as his own attorney at the time, rejected the offer.
Foor is scheduled to review Thurston’s petition Jan. 28.
Reach Jess Sullivan at 427-6919 or jsullivan@dailyrepublic.net. Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/jsullivandr.
The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
Fairfield ResidentJanuary 20, 2013 - 8:24 am
Thanks for making us aware of these cases....
Reply |Rich GiddensJanuary 20, 2013 - 1:17 pm
The United States is number one! Number one in the number of its citizens it has incarcerated! Why is that? Its simply because of the societal and economic destructive power of the welfare state and its equally wasteful police state. The politicians love this and perversely, the welfare recipients, cops and illegal aliens all love it too. That explains why they really don't attack each other or the politicians who enabled all of this in the first place. Welfare government crumbs provide the incentive to have as many children out of wedlock as possible---worse and tragically, many of the welfare ''moms'' know that if they smoke, drink and use street drugs their innocent offspring will be born severely disabled and will get social security disability that the ''mom'' will then use for her nefarious purposes. And that's exactly why all of this has happened.
Reply |Repeal 3-strikeJanuary 26, 2013 - 7:24 pm
Your article on Ronnie Winn was full of inadequate misinformation. Did you make this story up case you sure didn't get it from the record. There was no $3 dept or a girlfriend. I lived near Mr. Rendleman and sure was not the 60 year old inocent grandfather that you speak of. He was a drug user, drug pusher and alcoholic. Drug addicts ran in and out of his house daily and he was in fights on a daily base. I often had to call the police because of the shady characters that hung out at his place. I attended the court sessions and it was not proven that the foot print which by the way was made by someone wearing tennis shoes and Mr. Winn wore street shoes, were no made by Mr. Winn. Mr. Winn did not lift him up by throat but Mr. Rendleman did crack him over the head with a 40-ounce King Cobra bottle, which by the way is the drink of most alcoholics. Your article is nothing less than prejudical before Mr. Winn has his day in court. If the case was serious and violent why was Mr. Winn given involuntary manslaughter and not murder. The law requires that Mr. Winn's sentence be reduced or reversed and not based on accusations from a reporter who was not even there.
Reply |LilJanuary 26, 2013 - 9:46 pm
If you were there, why didn't you stop this fight? If you weren't there, you don't know any more about it than the reporter.
Reply |Repeal 3-strikeFebruary 05, 2013 - 2:31 pm
Lil....I said I lived in the area. Whether I was there would have no impact on stopping a fight. I did what I was suppose to do which is call the police. Just because the reporter writes a story doesn't make it so. Don't believe everything you read.
Reply |