Lonnie J. Kerley, left, was was indicted Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2011, by a Solano County grand jury on a charge of second-degree murder in connection with the 1996 death of Danna L. Dever, right, of Cordelia.

Lonnie J. Kerley, left, was was indicted Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2011, by a Solano County grand jury on a charge of second-degree murder in connection with the 1996 death of Danna L. Dever, right, of Cordelia.


Cold-case testimony continues with mistrial a concern

By From page A3 | December 18, 2012

FAIRFIELD — A cold-case murder trial for a Fairfield man starting its eighth week of testimony in what was originally billed as a four-week trial is wrapping up against growing pressure to avert a possible mistrial.

Lonnie J. Kerley’s jury trial started in October. On Monday, another juror was lost to a family medical issue, leaving 12 jurors and no alternate jurors. With the court set to be closed after the end of this week until next year, there was growing concern that not finishing the trial this week would likely spur at least one more juror to jump ship, forcing a mistrial.

The defense case for Kerley may wrap up as early as Tuesday morning, but prosecutors intend to call at least five rebuttal witnesses.

Kerley is accused of killing Danna Dever, who lived with Kerley and their 9-year-old daughter at their home in Cordelia. He reported Dever missing to Fairfield police in August 1996, saying she  walked out the door six weeks earlier and had not returned.

Dever’s badly decomposed, naked body was discovered in the summer of 1996 by farm workers in a ditch south of Dixon, but was not identified by authorities until 2007.

Jurors sat through a defense case in recent days that began with Kerley’s mother and father spending hours talking about what a good son they have and how there is no way he could have harmed Dever, who they say had a methamphetamine addiction and walked away from her family in June 1996.

Kerley’s attorney had two forensic anthropologists on the witness stand Monday. They tried to pick apart the testimony of the prosecution’s forensic anthropologist who examined Dever’s body in 2007 and again earlier this year, concluding that the broken bones found among Dever’s remains had been beaten and possibly strangled. The defense anthropologists testified that their examination of Dever’s remains in 2012 only turned up evidence pointing to Dever’s remains being damaged years after her death.

Jurors sat through hours of dueling anthropologists explaining why the size, angle and type of bone fractures, some of them only a few millimeters in size, supported their respective conclusions about whether Dever was murdered or likely died of a drug overdose, after which someone dumped her body.

At one point, one anthropologist on the witness stand carefully scrutinized pig bones cut up by the opposing expert and critiqued and compared the type of markings and fracture caused by the cutting tool.

Shortly before noon, Judge Alan P. Carter once again took a swipe at attorneys for ongoing acrimony that has repeatedly led to point-counterpoint questioning about the most minute and perhaps inconsequential points. After lunch, the prosecution brought its forensic anthropologist back to the witness stand. He was asked about 50 questions, with Kerley’s defense attorney objecting to more than one-third of those questions and Carter overruling all but two of those objections. That pattern has been largely the same throughout the trial.

Prosecutors are expected Tuesday to reveal to jurors newly discovered medical records from 1995 that reflect Dever being treated by a doctor for injuries from a beating by Kerley six months before she disappeared. Prosecutors not only want to reinforce their belief that Kerley was a violent man, but refute testimony from his parents about their son’s peaceful nature.

Reach Jess Sullivan at 427-6919 or [email protected] Follow him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/jsullivandr.

Jess Sullivan

Jess has covered the criminal justice system in Solano County for several years. He was an embedded reporter in Iraq in 2003.

Discussion | 4 comments

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • GemmaDecember 18, 2012 - 8:15 am

    I just don't believe that meth users carry on relationships with people who aren't also users. These two used together, he beat her, she stayed, they did more meth together, he beat her, she stayed, until the day he killed her. I hope there isn't a mistrial. She deserves JUSTICE!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Former FF residentDecember 19, 2012 - 12:17 am

    Don't bet on that idea Gemma... my exwife was a major league tweeker but I have never done drugs. They will maintain a relationship with anybody so long as it serves their needs or they benefit from it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • NesDecember 18, 2012 - 9:22 am

    I don't believe that it was just her using.. But to be with him it's possible she used to try to stay for her daughter.. I know the family and he is very strange, not normal by any means. He controlled Dana then when she was gone he controlled his daughter. He did none of the house keeping or laundry she was required to have it done by the time he got home. He never allowed his gf or daughter to visit friends or family other than his parents of course they will say he's an angel he's an old child. I believe he did this and Dana deserves justice. I hope his daughter sees what an animal he actually is and would want justice for her mother.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • lilchrisDecember 19, 2012 - 1:32 pm

    I believe Dana tried to leave but he wouldnt allow that. According to his mom Dana had "gone missing" before but they always "found" her and she went back. I think he finally got tired of her leaving and made sure it would not happen again.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2016 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.