FAIRFIELD-SUISUN, CALIFORNIA
sievers column sig

Business-local

World pension crises point to US worries

By From page C2 | May 25, 2014

As the baby boom generation moves toward retirement, and by definition will start to draw from their retirement assets, some significant financial problems loom.

First, since almost everyone is covered by Social Security, we all have a stake in that system. For years Social Security has existed because it takes in more money than it pays to retirees. So it functions on current cash flow while any excess goes into special U.S. government bonds to be redeemed later.

The catch is that the government has already spent the money and simply promises to pay later. With the current federal budget situation, this situation could change soon and should cause all of us some concern.

Numerous state and municipal pension systems are woefully underfunded, and not just a little bit.

Some examples are the state employee and teachers pensions for West Virginia and Louisiana. In California, San Diego and Orange County have had funding problems for years. A few years ago, one county in Alabama ran out of money and simply stopped paying pensions. The state has not helped so all those retirees simply lost that source of income. We are also seeing a grave example in Detroit where many stakeholders besides the pensioners are at risk.

There is no easy or painless way to solve this dilemma.

We have reasonably good pension systems in California but they have some problems too, just not as bad as elsewhere. The Public Employees’ Retirement System has been investigated several times for investment “irregularities.”

Clearly the unsettling part is what the future holds for the retirees of any plan that exhausts its money, like that county in Alabama. What do those people do who have reasonably expected to have a pension? For private pensions, the government has an insurance program that takes over failed private pensions, but that agency has its own funding problems.

Europe has provided some examples that are truly distressing.

Governments there seem to view the retirement savings of citizens as a convenient source of revenue since they do not want to reduce spending or allow privatization. Most European pensions are state plans so the government has easy access. Here are some frightening examples:

  • Hungary told citizens they could either remit their individual retirement savings to the state, or lose the right to the basic state pension but still have an obligation to contribute to it. This could shift control over $14 billion from individuals to the government.
  • Bulgaria has a similar idea for $300 million of private money but is settling for 20 percent after trade unions protested.
  • Poland wants to transfer of one-third of future contributions from individual retirement accounts to the state-run social security system. Since this system does not back its liabilities with stocks or even bonds, the money taken away from the savers will go directly to the state treasury and savers will lose about $2.3 billion annually.
  • In Ireland, the National Pension Reserve Fund was created in 2001 to support pensions in the years 2025-50. The plan also was to provide for the pensions of public sector employees, mainly university staff. However, in March 2009, the Irish government earmarked 4 billion euro from this fund for rescuing banks. In November 2010, the remaining savings of 2.5 billion euro was seized to support the bailout of the rest of the country.
  • The French parliament in 2010 took 33 billion euro from the national reserve pension fund to reduce the short-term pension deficit. So, the retirement savings intended for 2020-40 will be used in 2011-24 and the government will spend the extra resources on other purposes.

It looks like although the governments are able to enforce general participation in pension schemes, they do not seem to be the best guardians of the money accumulated there.

This is serious! We, too, should be watchful and clear with our government about what they should and should not do with our money.

Mark Sievers, president of Epsilon Financial Group, is a certified financial planner with a master’s in business administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Contact him at [email protected]

Mark Sievers

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 1 comment

The Daily Republic does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Please read our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy before commenting.

  • Rich GiddensMay 25, 2014 - 8:58 am

    No bailouts for irresponsible disloyal States like California, New York, New Jersey or Illinois! No bailout for horrible cities like Stockton, Detroit, Richmond and Vallejo!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Articles

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.